Electrical and mechanical differences between NEMA/IEEE and IEC ac low voltage random wound induction motors

R. McElveen, J. Korkeakoski, J. Malinowski
{"title":"Electrical and mechanical differences between NEMA/IEEE and IEC ac low voltage random wound induction motors","authors":"R. McElveen, J. Korkeakoski, J. Malinowski","doi":"10.1109/PCICON.2012.6549685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary standard for low voltage, random wound, induction motors in North American countries is National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) MG 1-2011. In some other countries, the governing standard is International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60034-1:2010. This paper compares performance, design and construction details of NEMA and IEC three phase, low voltage, random wound alternating current (AC) induction motors. Not only are there obvious mechanical mounting and dimensional differences, but design practices and electrical design norms are different as well. Users must recognize and provide for these variations as they manage projects in different parts of the world. Although testing standards have been fundamentally harmonized between IEEE, CSA and IEC in recent years, efficiency requirements in various countries are not uniform. Obtaining motors in compliance with common standards such as IEEE 841 or API 610 becomes difficult when considering IEC motor designs. This paper discusses the challenges that arise when trying to apply a NEMA based standard to an IEC motor design and vice versa.","PeriodicalId":133636,"journal":{"name":"2012 Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference (PCIC)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference (PCIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCICON.2012.6549685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The primary standard for low voltage, random wound, induction motors in North American countries is National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) MG 1-2011. In some other countries, the governing standard is International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60034-1:2010. This paper compares performance, design and construction details of NEMA and IEC three phase, low voltage, random wound alternating current (AC) induction motors. Not only are there obvious mechanical mounting and dimensional differences, but design practices and electrical design norms are different as well. Users must recognize and provide for these variations as they manage projects in different parts of the world. Although testing standards have been fundamentally harmonized between IEEE, CSA and IEC in recent years, efficiency requirements in various countries are not uniform. Obtaining motors in compliance with common standards such as IEEE 841 or API 610 becomes difficult when considering IEC motor designs. This paper discusses the challenges that arise when trying to apply a NEMA based standard to an IEC motor design and vice versa.
NEMA/IEEE和IEC交流低压无绕线感应电动机的电气和机械差异
北美国家低压无绕组感应电动机的主要标准是国家电气制造商协会(NEMA) MG 1-2011。在其他一些国家,管理标准是国际电工委员会(IEC) 60034-1:2010。本文比较了NEMA和IEC三相低压无绕线交流(AC)异步电动机的性能、设计和施工细节。不仅有明显的机械安装和尺寸差异,而且设计实践和电气设计规范也不同。当用户在世界不同地区管理项目时,他们必须认识到并提供这些变化。虽然近年来IEEE、CSA和IEC的测试标准已经基本统一,但各国的效率要求并不统一。在考虑IEC电机设计时,获得符合通用标准(如IEEE 841或API 610)的电机变得困难。本文讨论了在尝试将基于NEMA的标准应用于IEC电机设计时出现的挑战,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信