Political Fandom and Social Media Code of Ethics

Sung-Jin Yoo
{"title":"Political Fandom and Social Media Code of Ethics","authors":"Sung-Jin Yoo","doi":"10.54968/civicpol.2023.6.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the institutional efforts centered on political parties to offset the negative effects of political fandom that are frequently discussed in the current society. Based on overseas cases, it proposes ‘social media code of ethics’ for political parties in Korea as a way to reduce the negative effects of digital democracy. The Netherlands have already set up an agreement between political parties and online platform users according to IDEA's recommendation, and British political parties are making efforts to prevent the side effects of affective polarization by including social media-related policies in their own rules. Unlike the situation in other countries, there is no content to reduce the political harm of social media in our party constitution, party rules, and ethics regulations. The code of ethics proposed in this article consists of active opposition to hate speech and reckless digital attacks by individual political parties, compliance with responsible digital ethics, and voluntary disciplinary action and punishment in case of non-compliance. The code of ethics, declared in the form of an agreement between political parties, can be a starting point for political parties and politicians to adapt with a responsible attitude in the new change of daily life in political fandom.","PeriodicalId":250767,"journal":{"name":"Center for Civic Politics Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Civic Politics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54968/civicpol.2023.6.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the institutional efforts centered on political parties to offset the negative effects of political fandom that are frequently discussed in the current society. Based on overseas cases, it proposes ‘social media code of ethics’ for political parties in Korea as a way to reduce the negative effects of digital democracy. The Netherlands have already set up an agreement between political parties and online platform users according to IDEA's recommendation, and British political parties are making efforts to prevent the side effects of affective polarization by including social media-related policies in their own rules. Unlike the situation in other countries, there is no content to reduce the political harm of social media in our party constitution, party rules, and ethics regulations. The code of ethics proposed in this article consists of active opposition to hate speech and reckless digital attacks by individual political parties, compliance with responsible digital ethics, and voluntary disciplinary action and punishment in case of non-compliance. The code of ethics, declared in the form of an agreement between political parties, can be a starting point for political parties and politicians to adapt with a responsible attitude in the new change of daily life in political fandom.
政治狂热和社交媒体道德准则
本文考察了以政党为中心的制度性努力,以抵消当前社会中经常讨论的政治狂热的负面影响。为了减少数字民主主义的负面影响,以国外的事例为基础,向国内政党提出了“社交媒体道德准则”。荷兰已经根据IDEA的建议制定了政党和网络平台用户之间的协议,英国政党也在努力将社交媒体相关政策纳入自己的规则,以防止情感两极分化的副作用。与其他国家的情况不同,我们的党章、党规和道德规范中没有减少社交媒体政治危害的内容。本文提出的道德准则包括积极反对个别政党的仇恨言论和鲁莽的数字攻击,遵守负责任的数字道德,以及在不遵守的情况下自愿采取纪律处分和惩罚。以政党之间的协议形式发表的伦理准则,可以成为政党和政治家在政治圈日常生活的新变化中以负责任的态度适应的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信