THE GENEALOGY OF GESTURE: FROM KIRA MURATOVA TO RENATA LITVINOVA

Irina Schulzki
{"title":"THE GENEALOGY OF GESTURE: FROM KIRA MURATOVA TO RENATA LITVINOVA","authors":"Irina Schulzki","doi":"10.18522/2415-8852-2021-3-22-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The long-term creative collaboration between Kira Muratova and Renata Litvinova began with the film “Uvlechen’ya” (“Pastimes”, 1994), in which Litvinova took part both as an actress and a screenwriter. Since then, Litvinova has become one of the most striking personifications of Muratova’s ornamental film style, which brings about a specific regime of visibility by foregrounding the eccentric corporeality of non-professional actors, or gesturality as a category of bodily and speech performance. This article focuses on the primary scene of gestural genealogy linking the two directors: thus, the pathologist’s gesture from nurse Lilya’s monologue, written and recited by Litvinova in her inner eccentric manner in Muratova’s film, unfolds in a full-length film narration of “Rita’s Last Fairy Tale” (2012), with a phantasmagorical plot and spectacular visuals characteristic of Litvinova’s directorial style. The article addresses, on the one hand, this gesture, expressing concisely the manifold and bidirectional relation between Muratova’s and Litvinova’s films, and, on the other, discusses possible ways of theoretical conceptions of gesture in text and cinema. Gesture is conceived of as a borderline figure of speech and/or of body, aimed at an absent object, whereby the grasping function of the hand makes gestures to a figure of metalepsis which, translated into the language of cinema, emphasises the haptic character of the image. The missing object around which gesticulation arises leads to a discussion of the problematic status of gesture as a sign as well as to the disturbed process of signification during its interpretation. Since gesture only indicates and signals but does not signify, one can speak of the semiotic function of monstration. A gesture appears as a monster in the literal sense of the word, that is, the one who shows itself and, in so doing, warns. Thus, using gestures, to some extent requires adopting the position of a monster – to designate by putting oneself on the show, by making oneself the object of spectacle. Both films and the figure of Litvinova therein are viewed through the prism of monstrosity of gesture and language – it is through the disjunction between showing and speaking that gesture becomes exposed as a pure medium.","PeriodicalId":318261,"journal":{"name":"Practices & Interpretations: A Journal of Philology, Teaching and Cultural Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practices & Interpretations: A Journal of Philology, Teaching and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/2415-8852-2021-3-22-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The long-term creative collaboration between Kira Muratova and Renata Litvinova began with the film “Uvlechen’ya” (“Pastimes”, 1994), in which Litvinova took part both as an actress and a screenwriter. Since then, Litvinova has become one of the most striking personifications of Muratova’s ornamental film style, which brings about a specific regime of visibility by foregrounding the eccentric corporeality of non-professional actors, or gesturality as a category of bodily and speech performance. This article focuses on the primary scene of gestural genealogy linking the two directors: thus, the pathologist’s gesture from nurse Lilya’s monologue, written and recited by Litvinova in her inner eccentric manner in Muratova’s film, unfolds in a full-length film narration of “Rita’s Last Fairy Tale” (2012), with a phantasmagorical plot and spectacular visuals characteristic of Litvinova’s directorial style. The article addresses, on the one hand, this gesture, expressing concisely the manifold and bidirectional relation between Muratova’s and Litvinova’s films, and, on the other, discusses possible ways of theoretical conceptions of gesture in text and cinema. Gesture is conceived of as a borderline figure of speech and/or of body, aimed at an absent object, whereby the grasping function of the hand makes gestures to a figure of metalepsis which, translated into the language of cinema, emphasises the haptic character of the image. The missing object around which gesticulation arises leads to a discussion of the problematic status of gesture as a sign as well as to the disturbed process of signification during its interpretation. Since gesture only indicates and signals but does not signify, one can speak of the semiotic function of monstration. A gesture appears as a monster in the literal sense of the word, that is, the one who shows itself and, in so doing, warns. Thus, using gestures, to some extent requires adopting the position of a monster – to designate by putting oneself on the show, by making oneself the object of spectacle. Both films and the figure of Litvinova therein are viewed through the prism of monstrosity of gesture and language – it is through the disjunction between showing and speaking that gesture becomes exposed as a pure medium.
手势的谱系:从基拉·穆拉托娃到雷娜塔·利特维诺娃
基拉·穆拉托娃和列娜塔·利特维诺娃的长期创作合作始于1994年的电影《欢乐时光》(Uvlechen 'ya),利特维诺娃以演员和编剧的身份参与其中。从那时起,利特维诺娃成为穆拉托娃观赏电影风格中最引人注目的人格化之一,这种风格通过突出非专业演员古怪的身体,或将手势作为身体和语言表演的一种类别,带来了一种特定的可见性。本文关注的是连接两位导演的手势谱系的主要场景:因此,利特维诺娃在穆拉托娃的电影中以内心古怪的方式书写和背诵的护士莉莉娅独白中的病理学家的手势,在《丽塔的最后一个童话》(2012)的全长电影叙事中展开,具有利特维诺娃导演风格的梦幻般的情节和壮观的视觉效果。本文一方面论述了这一手势,简明地表达了穆拉托娃和利特维诺娃电影之间的多元和双向关系,另一方面探讨了文本和电影中手势理论概念的可能途径。手势被认为是一种言语和/或身体的边缘形象,针对一个不存在的物体,由此手的抓取功能使手势成为一个虚幻的形象,这被翻译成电影的语言,强调了形象的触觉特征。手势产生的缺失对象导致了对手势作为符号的问题状态的讨论,以及在其解释过程中对意义的干扰过程。既然手势只是指示和信号,而不是表示,那么我们就可以谈论示范的符号学功能。从字面意义上讲,手势就像怪物,也就是说,它展示了自己,并以此发出警告。因此,使用手势,在某种程度上需要采取一个怪物的位置——通过把自己放在表演中,通过把自己变成表演的对象来指定。电影和其中的利特维诺娃的形象都是通过手势和语言的怪物棱镜来观察的——正是通过表演和说话之间的脱节,手势才被暴露为一种纯粹的媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信