Criminal law measures to protect trade secrets: focusing on the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act

Y. Chung
{"title":"Criminal law measures to protect trade secrets: focusing on the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act","authors":"Y. Chung","doi":"10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.2.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the rapidly evolving high-tech industry, the significance of safeguarding trade secrets is growing exponentially as the risk of unauthorized access and information breaches continues to escalate. A “trade secret” is information, including a method of manufacture, method of sale, technical or business information useful in the conduct of business, which is not publicly known, is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy, and has independent economic value. The Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act in Korea serves to shield these trade secrets from infringement. Nonetheless, the current penalty structure outlined in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act faces several shortcomings. In practical terms, the offense of breaching professional trust has been widely employed to facilitate criminal sanctions against trade secret violations. However, this excessive reliance on the breach of professional trust crime has resulted in a lack of clarity regarding the elements stipulated in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. To effectively penalize accomplices involved in trade secret infringements and those attempting to unlawfully obtain trade secrets, a comprehensive and well-grounded approach must be adopted. This necessitates considering attempts, preparations, and conspiracies as integral components of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.","PeriodicalId":288398,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2023.43.2.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving high-tech industry, the significance of safeguarding trade secrets is growing exponentially as the risk of unauthorized access and information breaches continues to escalate. A “trade secret” is information, including a method of manufacture, method of sale, technical or business information useful in the conduct of business, which is not publicly known, is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy, and has independent economic value. The Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act in Korea serves to shield these trade secrets from infringement. Nonetheless, the current penalty structure outlined in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act faces several shortcomings. In practical terms, the offense of breaching professional trust has been widely employed to facilitate criminal sanctions against trade secret violations. However, this excessive reliance on the breach of professional trust crime has resulted in a lack of clarity regarding the elements stipulated in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. To effectively penalize accomplices involved in trade secret infringements and those attempting to unlawfully obtain trade secrets, a comprehensive and well-grounded approach must be adopted. This necessitates considering attempts, preparations, and conspiracies as integral components of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.
商业秘密保护的刑法措施:以《防止不正当竞争法》和《商业秘密保护法》为例
在快速发展的高科技产业中,随着未经授权访问和信息泄露的风险不断升级,保护商业秘密的重要性呈指数级增长。“商业秘密”是指不为公众所知的信息,包括制造方法、销售方法、对商业活动有用的技术或商业信息,是为保持其机密性而作出合理努力的对象,并具有独立的经济价值。韩国的《防止不正当竞争及商业秘密保护法》就是为了保护这些商业秘密不受侵犯。尽管如此,《防止不正当竞争和商业秘密保护法》中概述的现行处罚结构面临着几个缺点。在实践中,违反职业信任罪被广泛用于对侵犯商业秘密行为的刑事制裁。然而,这种对违反职业信托罪的过度依赖导致了《防止不正当竞争及商业秘密保护法》规定的要件缺乏明确性。要有效惩处侵犯商业秘密的共犯和企图非法获取商业秘密的人,必须采取全面而有根据的办法。这就需要将企图、准备和共谋视为《防止不正当竞争和商业秘密保护法》的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信