Russia’s “Fascism” or “Illiberalism”?

M. Laruelle
{"title":"Russia’s “Fascism” or “Illiberalism”?","authors":"M. Laruelle","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501754135.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the literature on generic fascism, on a supposed specific “Russian fascism,” and on the rise of illiberalism to posit the conceptual frames needed for the analysis of Russia. It also discusses the placement of fascism within the more general phenomenon of nationalism. The chapter views the primacy of a myth of regeneration as the driving engine that makes a vision of the world and society “fascist.” With such perspective, the chapter allows us to take into account the metapolitical dimension of fascism, which is critical for recognizing the phenomenon and dissociating it from other ideologies. It defines fascism as a metapolitical ideology that calls for the total destruction of modernity by creating an alternative world based on ancient values reconstructed with violent means. The chapter then shares the definition proposed by one of the main Russian scholars of fascism, Aleksandr A. Galkin, who characterized fascism as “rightist-conservative revolutionarism” (pravokonservativnyi revoliutsionarizm), emphasizing the revolutionary aspect more than the nationalist one. Ultimately, the chapter asserts that the terminological inflation of fascism that we currently observe obscures more than explains the structural transformations of our societies: the term illiberalism offers a significantly more heuristically helpful approach to capture the evolutions.","PeriodicalId":242339,"journal":{"name":"Is Russia Fascist?","volume":"03 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Is Russia Fascist?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501754135.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the literature on generic fascism, on a supposed specific “Russian fascism,” and on the rise of illiberalism to posit the conceptual frames needed for the analysis of Russia. It also discusses the placement of fascism within the more general phenomenon of nationalism. The chapter views the primacy of a myth of regeneration as the driving engine that makes a vision of the world and society “fascist.” With such perspective, the chapter allows us to take into account the metapolitical dimension of fascism, which is critical for recognizing the phenomenon and dissociating it from other ideologies. It defines fascism as a metapolitical ideology that calls for the total destruction of modernity by creating an alternative world based on ancient values reconstructed with violent means. The chapter then shares the definition proposed by one of the main Russian scholars of fascism, Aleksandr A. Galkin, who characterized fascism as “rightist-conservative revolutionarism” (pravokonservativnyi revoliutsionarizm), emphasizing the revolutionary aspect more than the nationalist one. Ultimately, the chapter asserts that the terminological inflation of fascism that we currently observe obscures more than explains the structural transformations of our societies: the term illiberalism offers a significantly more heuristically helpful approach to capture the evolutions.
俄罗斯是“法西斯主义”还是“反自由主义”?
本章探讨了关于一般法西斯主义的文献,关于一个假定的特定的“俄罗斯法西斯主义”,以及关于非自由主义的兴起,以设定分析俄罗斯所需的概念框架。它还讨论了法西斯主义在更普遍的民族主义现象中的地位。这一章将再生神话的首要地位视为驱动引擎,使世界和社会的愿景成为“法西斯主义”。有了这样的视角,本章允许我们考虑法西斯主义的元政治维度,这对于认识这一现象并将其与其他意识形态分离开来至关重要。它将法西斯主义定义为一种元政治意识形态,它呼吁通过以暴力手段重建的古老价值观为基础,创造一个替代世界,从而彻底摧毁现代性。然后,本章分享了俄罗斯主要的法西斯主义学者之一亚历山大·a·高尔金提出的定义,他将法西斯主义描述为“右翼-保守革命主义”(pravokconservativnyi revolutionionism),强调革命的方面多于民族主义的方面。最后,本章断言,我们目前观察到的法西斯主义术语膨胀,与其说是解释了我们社会的结构性转变,不如说是模糊了:“非自由主义”一词提供了一种更有启发性的方法来捕捉这些演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信