Linking Partial and General Equilibrium Models: A GTAP Application Using TASTE

B. Narayanan, T. Hertel, Mark Horridge
{"title":"Linking Partial and General Equilibrium Models: A GTAP Application Using TASTE","authors":"B. Narayanan, T. Hertel, Mark Horridge","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.283427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CGE models are utilized for the evaluation of trade policy reforms, yet they are typically highly aggregated, limiting their usefulness to trade negotiators interested in impacts at the tariff line. Partial Equilibrium (PE) models used for disaggregate analysis lack the benefits of an economy-wide analysis required to examine the overall impact of trade policy reforms. This suggests the need for a PE-GE, nested modeling framework to support trade policy analysis. In this paper, we develop a PE model that captures international trade, domestic consumption and output, using CET and CES structures, market clearing conditions and price linkages, nested within the standard GTAP Model. In addition, we extend the welfare decomposition of Huff and Hertel (2001) to this PE-GE model to contrast the sources of welfare gain among models. To illustrate the value-added of this model, we examine the impact of multi-lateral tariff liberalization on the Indian economy, with special focus on the auto sector, using PE, GE and PE-GE models. The PE model does not predict the change in overall size and price level for the industry well, while the GE model underestimates the aggregate welfare gain due to tariff averaging. It also fails to account for the change in industry composition resulting from trade reform. These findings are robust to wide variation in model parameters. We conclude that the linked model is superior to both the GE and PE counterparts.","PeriodicalId":281904,"journal":{"name":"GTAP Technical Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GTAP Technical Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.283427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

CGE models are utilized for the evaluation of trade policy reforms, yet they are typically highly aggregated, limiting their usefulness to trade negotiators interested in impacts at the tariff line. Partial Equilibrium (PE) models used for disaggregate analysis lack the benefits of an economy-wide analysis required to examine the overall impact of trade policy reforms. This suggests the need for a PE-GE, nested modeling framework to support trade policy analysis. In this paper, we develop a PE model that captures international trade, domestic consumption and output, using CET and CES structures, market clearing conditions and price linkages, nested within the standard GTAP Model. In addition, we extend the welfare decomposition of Huff and Hertel (2001) to this PE-GE model to contrast the sources of welfare gain among models. To illustrate the value-added of this model, we examine the impact of multi-lateral tariff liberalization on the Indian economy, with special focus on the auto sector, using PE, GE and PE-GE models. The PE model does not predict the change in overall size and price level for the industry well, while the GE model underestimates the aggregate welfare gain due to tariff averaging. It also fails to account for the change in industry composition resulting from trade reform. These findings are robust to wide variation in model parameters. We conclude that the linked model is superior to both the GE and PE counterparts.
连接部分和一般均衡模型:使用TASTE的GTAP应用
一般通用模型用于评估贸易政策改革,但它们通常是高度汇总的,限制了它们对对关税影响感兴趣的贸易谈判代表的用处。用于分类分析的部分均衡(PE)模型缺乏检验贸易政策改革总体影响所需的全经济分析的好处。这表明需要PE-GE嵌套建模框架来支持贸易政策分析。在本文中,我们开发了一个PE模型,利用CET和CES结构、市场出清条件和价格联系,在标准GTAP模型中嵌套,捕捉国际贸易、国内消费和产出。此外,我们将Huff和Hertel(2001)的福利分解扩展到该PE-GE模型中,以对比模型之间福利收益的来源。为了说明该模型的附加值,我们研究了多边关税自由化对印度经济的影响,特别关注汽车行业,使用PE, GE和PE-GE模型。PE模型不能很好地预测行业的总体规模和价格水平的变化,而GE模型低估了由于关税平均而产生的总福利收益。它也没有考虑到贸易改革导致的行业构成变化。这些发现对模型参数的广泛变化具有鲁棒性。我们得出结论,链接模型优于GE和PE的对应模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信