Environmental and Cost Efficiency Analysis of Electric Power Generation Using DEA-MB Model

Qin Li, Siying Cao
{"title":"Environmental and Cost Efficiency Analysis of Electric Power Generation Using DEA-MB Model","authors":"Qin Li, Siying Cao","doi":"10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5301389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper applies a Data Envelopment Analysis procedure that incorporates the Mass Balance to estimate the allocations of coal, gas and oil inputs that minimize carbon emissions and costs. Findings for our three-input(coal, gas and oil) sample show that there would be a 79% increase in cost for moving from the cost efficient point to the carbon efficient point, while there would be a 38% increase in carbon for moving from the carbon efficient point to the cost efficient point. These conclusions indicate that, in general, the gap between efficient cost and efficient environmental production is wide, and would require substantial policy intervention or market adjustment before it could be narrowed. The paper also extends the application of the Data Envelopment Analysis- Mass Balance (DEA-MB) methodology by illustrating how the procedure can be used to identify the consequences of specific decisions for individual plants. The methodology for detailed plant analysis that offers enhanced analytical decision-making at the individual plant level for regulators and managements. Keywords-environmental and cost efficienc; DEA; MB; electric power generation I. INTRODUCTION With the development of economic, the electric power industry is also increasingly rapidly. The Environmental Protection Agency calculates that electricity generation accounts for 40% of carbon dioxide emissions. As government and industry begin to devise mechanisms for reducing GHG, analytical methods that provide better information to policy making and industry decisions can result in improved economic and environmental outcomes. Some researches have applied Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to develop technical efficiency models for firms that include variables measuring pollution, but none of these DEA studies have incorporated carbon emissions and extern environmental estimates into their models. In this paper, we apply Data Envelopment Analysis-Mass Balance (DEA-MB) methodology to analyze the allocation of fossil-fuels in electric power generation, considering both economic and carbon inputs and outputs. In addition, the paper also extends the application of the DEA-MB methodology by illustrating how the procedure can be used to identify the consequences of specific decisions for individual plants. The methodology for detailed plant analysis that offers enhanced analytical decision-making at the individual plant level for regulators and managements. II. DEA-MB MODEL","PeriodicalId":267621,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5301389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper applies a Data Envelopment Analysis procedure that incorporates the Mass Balance to estimate the allocations of coal, gas and oil inputs that minimize carbon emissions and costs. Findings for our three-input(coal, gas and oil) sample show that there would be a 79% increase in cost for moving from the cost efficient point to the carbon efficient point, while there would be a 38% increase in carbon for moving from the carbon efficient point to the cost efficient point. These conclusions indicate that, in general, the gap between efficient cost and efficient environmental production is wide, and would require substantial policy intervention or market adjustment before it could be narrowed. The paper also extends the application of the Data Envelopment Analysis- Mass Balance (DEA-MB) methodology by illustrating how the procedure can be used to identify the consequences of specific decisions for individual plants. The methodology for detailed plant analysis that offers enhanced analytical decision-making at the individual plant level for regulators and managements. Keywords-environmental and cost efficienc; DEA; MB; electric power generation I. INTRODUCTION With the development of economic, the electric power industry is also increasingly rapidly. The Environmental Protection Agency calculates that electricity generation accounts for 40% of carbon dioxide emissions. As government and industry begin to devise mechanisms for reducing GHG, analytical methods that provide better information to policy making and industry decisions can result in improved economic and environmental outcomes. Some researches have applied Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to develop technical efficiency models for firms that include variables measuring pollution, but none of these DEA studies have incorporated carbon emissions and extern environmental estimates into their models. In this paper, we apply Data Envelopment Analysis-Mass Balance (DEA-MB) methodology to analyze the allocation of fossil-fuels in electric power generation, considering both economic and carbon inputs and outputs. In addition, the paper also extends the application of the DEA-MB methodology by illustrating how the procedure can be used to identify the consequences of specific decisions for individual plants. The methodology for detailed plant analysis that offers enhanced analytical decision-making at the individual plant level for regulators and managements. II. DEA-MB MODEL
基于DEA-MB模型的发电环境与成本效益分析
本文采用数据包络分析程序,结合质量平衡来估计煤炭、天然气和石油投入的分配,以最大限度地减少碳排放和成本。我们的三种输入(煤、天然气和石油)样本的研究结果表明,从成本效率点向碳效率点转移的成本将增加79%,而从碳效率点向成本效率点转移的碳排放将增加38%。这些结论表明,一般来说,有效的成本生产和有效的环境生产之间的差距很大,需要大量的政策干预或市场调整才能缩小差距。本文还扩展了数据包络分析-质量平衡(DEA-MB)方法的应用,说明了该程序如何用于识别单个工厂特定决策的后果。详细的工厂分析方法,为监管机构和管理层在单个工厂层面提供增强的分析决策。关键词:环境与成本效益;DEA;MB;随着经济的发展,电力工业的发展也日益迅速。据环境保护署计算,发电占二氧化碳排放量的40%。随着政府和行业开始设计减少温室气体的机制,为政策制定和行业决策提供更好信息的分析方法可以改善经济和环境结果。一些研究已经应用数据包络分析(DEA)为企业开发了技术效率模型,其中包括测量污染的变量,但这些DEA研究都没有将碳排放和外部环境估计纳入其模型。在本文中,我们应用数据包络分析-质量平衡(DEA-MB)方法来分析发电中化石燃料的分配,同时考虑经济和碳的投入和产出。此外,本文还扩展了DEA-MB方法的应用,说明了如何使用该程序来确定单个植物的特定决策的后果。详细的工厂分析方法,为监管机构和管理层在单个工厂层面提供增强的分析决策。2DEA-MB模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信