Pola stoljeća hrvatske politike (1895. – 1945.) u korespondenciji između Dominika Mandića i Jere Jareba

Marina Beus
{"title":"Pola stoljeća hrvatske politike (1895. – 1945.) u korespondenciji između Dominika Mandića i Jere Jareba","authors":"Marina Beus","doi":"10.47960/2712-1844.2018.4.287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Preparing the publication of Jareb's book titled Half a Century of Croatian Politics (1895-1945) - on the Occasion of Macek's auto-biography , which was based on the synthesis and the elaborati-on of the same work published in three parts in Hrvatska revija (Croatian Review) , the author, as he emphasized in the book's preface, trying to depict this turbulent period of Croatian history as objectively as possible, asked several people for a more critical opinion, among whom the historian Fr. Dominik Mandic. There were four letters in the saved correspondence, which te-stified about the polemics between the two historians, especially regarding the Yugoslav national and state idea, and the position of the Catholic Movement and the Croatian People's Party on this issue. Although Mandic's critical review appeared with a re-latively satisfactory time distance when it comes to a historical analysis of disputable issues, especially given the HPS situation, which disappeared from the political scene in 1929, or the be-ginning of the Croatian Catholic Movement. However, it can be concluded from Jareb's presented counterarguments that he re-cognized in Mandic's review a dose of non-objectivism when it comes to defending former political orientations.","PeriodicalId":269897,"journal":{"name":"Hercegovina. Serija 3: časopis za kulturno i povijesno nasljeđe","volume":"74 Pt C 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hercegovina. Serija 3: časopis za kulturno i povijesno nasljeđe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47960/2712-1844.2018.4.287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Preparing the publication of Jareb's book titled Half a Century of Croatian Politics (1895-1945) - on the Occasion of Macek's auto-biography , which was based on the synthesis and the elaborati-on of the same work published in three parts in Hrvatska revija (Croatian Review) , the author, as he emphasized in the book's preface, trying to depict this turbulent period of Croatian history as objectively as possible, asked several people for a more critical opinion, among whom the historian Fr. Dominik Mandic. There were four letters in the saved correspondence, which te-stified about the polemics between the two historians, especially regarding the Yugoslav national and state idea, and the position of the Catholic Movement and the Croatian People's Party on this issue. Although Mandic's critical review appeared with a re-latively satisfactory time distance when it comes to a historical analysis of disputable issues, especially given the HPS situation, which disappeared from the political scene in 1929, or the be-ginning of the Croatian Catholic Movement. However, it can be concluded from Jareb's presented counterarguments that he re-cognized in Mandic's review a dose of non-objectivism when it comes to defending former political orientations.
在准备出版Jareb的书《克罗地亚政治的半个世纪(1895-1945)- -在马切克自传的时候,这本书是根据在Hrvatska revija(克罗地亚评论)上分三部分发表的同一部作品的综合和详细阐述,作者在书的序言中强调,他试图尽可能客观地描绘克罗地亚历史上这一动荡时期,请几个人提出更批评性的意见。其中包括历史学家多米尼克·曼迪奇神父。保存下来的信件中有四封信,记录了两位历史学家之间的争论,特别是关于南斯拉夫民族和国家观念的争论,以及天主教运动和克罗地亚人民党在这个问题上的立场。尽管曼迪奇的批判性评论在对有争议的问题进行历史分析时出现了相对令人满意的时间距离,特别是考虑到1929年从政治舞台上消失的HPS情况,或者克罗地亚天主教运动的开始。然而,从Jareb提出的反驳中可以得出结论,他在曼迪奇的评论中认识到,在为以前的政治取向辩护时,有一定程度的非客观主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信