S(C)ENTINEL: monitoring automated vehicles with olfactory reliability displays

Philipp Wintersberger, D. Dmitrenko, Clemens Schartmüller, Anna-Katharina Frison, E. Maggioni, Marianna Obrist, A. Riener
{"title":"S(C)ENTINEL: monitoring automated vehicles with olfactory reliability displays","authors":"Philipp Wintersberger, D. Dmitrenko, Clemens Schartmüller, Anna-Katharina Frison, E. Maggioni, Marianna Obrist, A. Riener","doi":"10.1145/3301275.3302332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Overreliance in technology is safety-critical and it is assumed that this could have been a main cause of severe accidents with automated vehicles. To ease the complex task of permanently monitoring vehicle behavior in the driving environment, researchers have proposed to implement reliability/uncertainty displays. Such displays allow to estimate whether or not an upcoming intervention is likely. However, presenting uncertainty just adds more visual workload on drivers, who might also be engaged in secondary tasks. We suggest to use olfactory displays as a potential solution to communicate system uncertainty and conducted a user study (N=25) in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Results of the experiment (conditions: no reliability display, purely visual reliability display, and visual-olfactory reliability display) comping both objective (task performance) and subjective (technology acceptance model, trust scales, semi-structured interviews) measures suggest that olfactory notifications could become a valuable extension for calibrating trust in automated vehicles.","PeriodicalId":153096,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Overreliance in technology is safety-critical and it is assumed that this could have been a main cause of severe accidents with automated vehicles. To ease the complex task of permanently monitoring vehicle behavior in the driving environment, researchers have proposed to implement reliability/uncertainty displays. Such displays allow to estimate whether or not an upcoming intervention is likely. However, presenting uncertainty just adds more visual workload on drivers, who might also be engaged in secondary tasks. We suggest to use olfactory displays as a potential solution to communicate system uncertainty and conducted a user study (N=25) in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Results of the experiment (conditions: no reliability display, purely visual reliability display, and visual-olfactory reliability display) comping both objective (task performance) and subjective (technology acceptance model, trust scales, semi-structured interviews) measures suggest that olfactory notifications could become a valuable extension for calibrating trust in automated vehicles.
S(C)ENTINEL:用嗅觉可靠性显示器监测自动驾驶车辆
对技术的过度依赖对安全至关重要,人们认为这可能是自动驾驶汽车发生严重事故的主要原因。为了简化在驾驶环境中长期监测车辆行为的复杂任务,研究人员提出了实现可靠性/不确定性显示的方法。这样的表现可以用来估计即将到来的干预是否可能。然而,呈现不确定性只会给司机增加更多的视觉负担,他们也可能从事次要任务。我们建议使用嗅觉显示器作为沟通系统不确定性的潜在解决方案,并在高保真驾驶模拟器中进行了用户研究(N=25)。实验结果(条件:无可靠性显示、纯视觉可靠性显示和视觉嗅觉可靠性显示)结合客观(任务绩效)和主观(技术接受模型、信任量表、半结构化访谈)措施表明,嗅觉通知可能成为校准自动驾驶车辆信任的有价值的延伸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信