Overcoming cultural trauma through re-invention of the historical agency of the Kazakh nomadic culture in the works of Olzhas Suleimenov in the 1960s

Krupko I.V., Ashimova S.A.
{"title":"Overcoming cultural trauma through re-invention of the historical agency of the Kazakh nomadic culture in the works of Olzhas Suleimenov in the 1960s","authors":"Krupko I.V., Ashimova S.A.","doi":"10.31489/2022hph4/98-109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the reflection on the historiosophical works of the Kazakh poet of the sixties Olzhas Suleimenov, the key plot for the Kazakhs to acquire multiple identities and historical subjectivity in the 20th century: the loss of the nomadic way of life, the museumified play of symbols of nomadic existence from the point of its no return (urban chronotope of sedentarized nomadic culture), the reception of historical memory of the post-nomads of the heritage of the medieval urban culture of Central Asia, the dialogue of the new historical subjectivity with the world culture (inscribing the national into the planetary) and the reinvention of its images, seen by the Kazakh intelligentsia in the reflections of ancient history. The studied literary and historiosophical material make it possible to comprehend the issue of the correlation between nomadic and sedentary in the historical memory of Kazakhstani society and the presence of a cultural trauma of “non-historicality” here, overcome in the second half of the 20th century. The factors that formed this cultural trauma include 1) the interruption of nomadic culture as a result of forced collectivization and sedentarization of the 1920s -1930s; 2) the historiographic tradition of describing nomadic culture as regressive and its perception by the Kazakh national intelligentsia in the 1960s and 1970s through the dominant historical narrative. The way to overcome this trauma was the reception of the cultural heritage of the medieval urban culture of Central Asia, the active archaeological research of which began in these years in the Kazakh SSR and the inscribing of a reinvented historical subjectivity in the world history of civilization, which, in turn, contributed to the formationof multiple identities at the level of representation of historical memory.","PeriodicalId":279276,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Karaganda university History.Philosophy series","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Karaganda university History.Philosophy series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31489/2022hph4/98-109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the reflection on the historiosophical works of the Kazakh poet of the sixties Olzhas Suleimenov, the key plot for the Kazakhs to acquire multiple identities and historical subjectivity in the 20th century: the loss of the nomadic way of life, the museumified play of symbols of nomadic existence from the point of its no return (urban chronotope of sedentarized nomadic culture), the reception of historical memory of the post-nomads of the heritage of the medieval urban culture of Central Asia, the dialogue of the new historical subjectivity with the world culture (inscribing the national into the planetary) and the reinvention of its images, seen by the Kazakh intelligentsia in the reflections of ancient history. The studied literary and historiosophical material make it possible to comprehend the issue of the correlation between nomadic and sedentary in the historical memory of Kazakhstani society and the presence of a cultural trauma of “non-historicality” here, overcome in the second half of the 20th century. The factors that formed this cultural trauma include 1) the interruption of nomadic culture as a result of forced collectivization and sedentarization of the 1920s -1930s; 2) the historiographic tradition of describing nomadic culture as regressive and its perception by the Kazakh national intelligentsia in the 1960s and 1970s through the dominant historical narrative. The way to overcome this trauma was the reception of the cultural heritage of the medieval urban culture of Central Asia, the active archaeological research of which began in these years in the Kazakh SSR and the inscribing of a reinvented historical subjectivity in the world history of civilization, which, in turn, contributed to the formationof multiple identities at the level of representation of historical memory.
20世纪60年代Olzhas Suleimenov作品中对哈萨克游牧文化历史主体的重塑,克服文化创伤
本文对60年代哈萨克诗人苏莱曼诺夫的历史哲学作品进行了反思,这是20世纪哈萨克人获得多重身份和历史主体性的关键情节。游牧生活方式的丧失,游牧存在符号的博物馆化游戏(定居游牧文化的城市计时器),后游牧民族对中亚中世纪城市文化遗产的历史记忆的接受,新的历史主体性与世界文化的对话(将国家铭刻到行星上)及其图像的再创造,这是哈萨克知识分子对古代历史的反思。研究的文学和历史哲学材料使人们有可能理解哈萨克斯坦社会历史记忆中游牧和定居之间的相关性问题,以及在20世纪下半叶克服的“非历史性”文化创伤的存在。形成这一文化创伤的因素包括:(1)20世纪20 - 30年代强制集体化和定居化导致游牧文化中断;2) 20世纪60年代和70年代哈萨克民族知识分子通过主流历史叙事对游牧文化退步的史学传统及其感知。克服这一创伤的方法是接受中亚中世纪城市文化的文化遗产,这几年在哈萨克斯坦苏维埃社会主义共和国开始了积极的考古研究,并在世界文明史上刻下了一种重新发明的历史主体性,这反过来又有助于在历史记忆的表现层面形成多重身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信