Internal Controls and Accounting Restatements Under Sarbanes-Oxley Regime: A Survey of Literature

Joshua King Obeng-Nyarko
{"title":"Internal Controls and Accounting Restatements Under Sarbanes-Oxley Regime: A Survey of Literature","authors":"Joshua King Obeng-Nyarko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1941839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 of the U. S. was passed to instil investor confidence in financial reporting following the spectacular collapse of high ranking firms in the US. Sections 302 and 404 provide clear guidelines to both management and their auditors on their respective roles as well as stipulating the penalties for non-compliance. The role of internal controls failures in corporate collapses cannot be overstated; however, not much attention has been paid to it in the past. Thanks to this act, the role of internal control over financial reporting has been recognized for some time now as an important component of corporate governance for both management and auditors (Kinney, 2000). Using mainly electronic searches, this critical review has found that scholars do not agree over the significance of sections 302 and 404 on internal control over financial reporting. Since the ACT was passed to improve the quality of financial reporting and to bring back investor confidence in the capital markets, the apparent inconsistencies over its impact on companies, provides opportunities for further research, especially from the UK companies perspective.","PeriodicalId":314833,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: International/Non-US (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: International/Non-US (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 of the U. S. was passed to instil investor confidence in financial reporting following the spectacular collapse of high ranking firms in the US. Sections 302 and 404 provide clear guidelines to both management and their auditors on their respective roles as well as stipulating the penalties for non-compliance. The role of internal controls failures in corporate collapses cannot be overstated; however, not much attention has been paid to it in the past. Thanks to this act, the role of internal control over financial reporting has been recognized for some time now as an important component of corporate governance for both management and auditors (Kinney, 2000). Using mainly electronic searches, this critical review has found that scholars do not agree over the significance of sections 302 and 404 on internal control over financial reporting. Since the ACT was passed to improve the quality of financial reporting and to bring back investor confidence in the capital markets, the apparent inconsistencies over its impact on companies, provides opportunities for further research, especially from the UK companies perspective.
萨班斯-奥克斯利制度下的内部控制与会计重述:文献综述
2002年,美国通过了《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》(Sarbanes-Oxley Act),目的是在美国排名靠前的公司纷纷倒闭后,向投资者灌输对财务报告的信心。第302和404条为管理层及其审计员各自的角色提供了明确的指导方针,并规定了不遵守规定的处罚。内部控制失灵在企业倒闭中的作用怎么强调都不为过;然而,在过去,它并没有得到太多的重视。由于这一行为,内部控制对财务报告的作用已经被公认为管理层和审计师公司治理的重要组成部分(Kinney, 2000)。主要使用电子搜索,这一批判性审查发现,学者们不同意第302和404节对财务报告内部控制的重要性。由于ACT的通过是为了提高财务报告的质量,并恢复投资者对资本市场的信心,其对公司影响的明显不一致,为进一步研究提供了机会,特别是从英国公司的角度来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信