Proposing an Academic Space of “Autism and Profound Learning Disability”

Ned Redmore
{"title":"Proposing an Academic Space of “Autism and Profound Learning Disability”","authors":"Ned Redmore","doi":"10.13169/intljofdissocjus.3.2.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article makes a practical suggestion to addressing the acute marginalisation of people with complex needs within academia. To do this, it first explores how the academic use of the terms “autism” and “severe/profound learning disabilities” leads to exclusionary practices where people with complex needs cannot represent themselves in research about their lives. These practices, this article contends, are epistemically and ethically unjustified. It demonstrates the former by exploring the shared ways in which people with complex needs are known in academic and social contexts. Regarding the latter, it argues that the research fields of autism and learning disabilities have favoured practices that exclude people with complex needs. To improve their academic representation, an academic space of “autism and profound learning disability” is proposed by drawing from Kraus’s (2015) theory of lifeworlds and life-conditions. The aim of the space is to be open and inclusive to any person with complex needs related to the terms “autism” and “severe/profound learning disabilities”, and to develop ethical research and practices that include their perspectives, views, and values. The paper concludes by presenting a preliminary agenda for the space.","PeriodicalId":448882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability and Social Justice","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/intljofdissocjus.3.2.0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article makes a practical suggestion to addressing the acute marginalisation of people with complex needs within academia. To do this, it first explores how the academic use of the terms “autism” and “severe/profound learning disabilities” leads to exclusionary practices where people with complex needs cannot represent themselves in research about their lives. These practices, this article contends, are epistemically and ethically unjustified. It demonstrates the former by exploring the shared ways in which people with complex needs are known in academic and social contexts. Regarding the latter, it argues that the research fields of autism and learning disabilities have favoured practices that exclude people with complex needs. To improve their academic representation, an academic space of “autism and profound learning disability” is proposed by drawing from Kraus’s (2015) theory of lifeworlds and life-conditions. The aim of the space is to be open and inclusive to any person with complex needs related to the terms “autism” and “severe/profound learning disabilities”, and to develop ethical research and practices that include their perspectives, views, and values. The paper concludes by presenting a preliminary agenda for the space.
构建“自闭症与深度学习障碍”学术空间
本文提出了一个切实可行的建议,以解决学术界中有复杂需求的人的严重边缘化。为了做到这一点,它首先探讨了“自闭症”和“严重/深度学习障碍”这两个术语的学术使用是如何导致具有复杂需求的人无法在关于他们生活的研究中代表自己的排斥性做法的。本文认为,这些做法在认识论和伦理上都是不合理的。它通过探索在学术和社会环境中了解具有复杂需求的人的共同方式来证明前者。关于后者,它认为自闭症和学习障碍的研究领域倾向于将有复杂需求的人排除在外。为了提高他们的学术代表性,借鉴Kraus(2015)的生活世界和生活条件理论,提出了“自闭症和深度学习障碍”的学术空间。该空间的目标是对任何与“自闭症”和“严重/深度学习障碍”相关的复杂需求的人开放和包容,并开展包含他们的观点、观点和价值观的伦理研究和实践。论文最后提出了该空间的初步议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书