Cofiring biomass and coal for fossil fuel reduction and other benefits - status of North American facilities in 2010.

D. Nicholls, J. Zerbe
{"title":"Cofiring biomass and coal for fossil fuel reduction and other benefits - status of North American facilities in 2010.","authors":"D. Nicholls, J. Zerbe","doi":"10.2737/PNW-GTR-867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cofiring of biomass and coal at electrical generation facilities is gaining in importance as a means of reducing fossil fuel consumption, and more than 40 facilities in the United States have conducted test burns. Given the large size of many coal plants, cofiring at even low rates has the potential to utilize relatively large volumes of biomass. This could have important forest management implications if harvest residues or salvage timber are supplied to coal plants. Other feedstocks suitable for cofiring include wood products manufacturing residues, woody municipal wastes, agricultural residues, short-rotation intensive culture forests, or hazard fuel removals. Cofiring at low rates can often be done with minimal changes to plant handling and processing equipment, requiring little capital investment. Cofiring at higher rates can involve repowering entire burners to burn biomass in place of coal, or in some cases, repowering entire powerplants. Our research evaluates the current status of biomass cofiring in North America, identifying current trends and success stories, types of biomass used, coal plant sizes, and primary cofiring regions. We also identify potential barriers to cofiring. Results are presented for more than a dozen plants that are currently cofiring or have recently announced plans to cofire.","PeriodicalId":282363,"journal":{"name":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Cofiring of biomass and coal at electrical generation facilities is gaining in importance as a means of reducing fossil fuel consumption, and more than 40 facilities in the United States have conducted test burns. Given the large size of many coal plants, cofiring at even low rates has the potential to utilize relatively large volumes of biomass. This could have important forest management implications if harvest residues or salvage timber are supplied to coal plants. Other feedstocks suitable for cofiring include wood products manufacturing residues, woody municipal wastes, agricultural residues, short-rotation intensive culture forests, or hazard fuel removals. Cofiring at low rates can often be done with minimal changes to plant handling and processing equipment, requiring little capital investment. Cofiring at higher rates can involve repowering entire burners to burn biomass in place of coal, or in some cases, repowering entire powerplants. Our research evaluates the current status of biomass cofiring in North America, identifying current trends and success stories, types of biomass used, coal plant sizes, and primary cofiring regions. We also identify potential barriers to cofiring. Results are presented for more than a dozen plants that are currently cofiring or have recently announced plans to cofire.
生物质和煤共烧减少化石燃料和其他效益——2010年北美设施现状。
作为减少化石燃料消耗的一种手段,在发电设施中生物质和煤的共燃越来越重要,美国已有40多个设施进行了试验燃烧。考虑到许多煤电厂的规模很大,即使以较低的速率共燃也有可能利用相对大量的生物质。如果采伐的残余物或回收木材供应给燃煤电厂,这可能对森林管理产生重要影响。其他适用于共烧的原料包括木制品制造残留物、木质城市废弃物、农业残留物、短周期集约化栽培森林或危险燃料清除。低速率的共烧通常可以通过对工厂处理和加工设备的最小改变来完成,需要很少的资本投资。以更高的速率共燃可能需要重新为整个燃烧器提供动力,以燃烧生物质代替煤炭,或者在某些情况下,重新为整个发电厂提供动力。我们的研究评估了北美生物质共烧的现状,确定了当前的趋势和成功案例、使用的生物质类型、煤电厂规模和主要共烧区域。我们还确定了共烧的潜在障碍。报告介绍了十几个目前正在共烧或最近宣布计划共烧的电厂的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信