Sextus Empiricus and Aurelius Augustinus: on the genesis of the medieval concept of the nature of evil

A. A. Kovalev
{"title":"Sextus Empiricus and Aurelius Augustinus: on the genesis of the medieval concept of the nature of evil","authors":"A. A. Kovalev","doi":"10.24151/2409-1073-2021-2-175-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to study the genesis of the medieval concept of evil, for which the analysis and comparison of the views of Augustine the Blessed as one of the founders and the greatest representative of scholasticism and Sextus Empiricus as a prominent representative of skepticism, whose views have been fruitfully used by Christian theologians as a set of ideas subject to reasonable criticism, have been carried out. Augustine substantiated his understanding of the phenomenon of evil and his own theodicy, refuting the views of Sextus Empiricus and thinkers who had worked in similar intellectual traditions. The skeptics’ arguments deserve attention to this day, providing the foundation for the intellectual justification of deism and atheism.","PeriodicalId":274213,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24151/2409-1073-2021-2-175-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the genesis of the medieval concept of evil, for which the analysis and comparison of the views of Augustine the Blessed as one of the founders and the greatest representative of scholasticism and Sextus Empiricus as a prominent representative of skepticism, whose views have been fruitfully used by Christian theologians as a set of ideas subject to reasonable criticism, have been carried out. Augustine substantiated his understanding of the phenomenon of evil and his own theodicy, refuting the views of Sextus Empiricus and thinkers who had worked in similar intellectual traditions. The skeptics’ arguments deserve attention to this day, providing the foundation for the intellectual justification of deism and atheism.
塞克斯图斯·恩比理克斯和奥勒留·奥古斯都:论中世纪恶的本质概念的起源
本文的目的是研究中世纪恶概念的起源,并对奥古斯丁作为经院哲学的创始人和最伟大的代表人物之一的观点和塞克斯图斯·恩里克乌斯作为怀疑主义的杰出代表的观点进行了分析和比较,他们的观点被基督教神学家作为一套合理批评的思想进行了卓有成效的运用。奥古斯丁证实了他对邪恶现象的理解和他自己的神正论,驳斥了塞克斯图斯·恩皮里克和其他在类似的知识传统中工作的思想家的观点。怀疑论者的论点值得关注到今天,为自然神论和无神论的理性辩护提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信