Juicios de equidad: efectos de contexto en ganancias y pérdidas

Raúl Reyes-Contreras, Carlos Santoyo Velasco
{"title":"Juicios de equidad: efectos de contexto en ganancias y pérdidas","authors":"Raúl Reyes-Contreras, Carlos Santoyo Velasco","doi":"10.24265/liberabit.2022.v28n2.534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previous studies have evaluated mathematical models of equity judgments of two hypothetical employees with distinct merits. They found that the model of proportionality adequately described the data based on an algebraic additive rule of information integration. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence concerning the effect of a context of monetary losses on the rules of information integration. Objective: To assess the effect of monetary gains and losses on equity judgments, and the effect of the personal context in which the participants are involved in decision-making. Method: A repeated measures design with within-subjects factors was utilized: 7 levels of A’s merit x 5 levels of B’s merit x 2 contexts (gains and losses) x 2 between-subject factors (third-party allocation and self-allocation). Results: Statistically significant differences appeared between thirdparty allocation and self-allocation conditions for gains [F (1,38) = 216.18, p < .001, η2P = .85] and losses [F (1,38) = 110.45, p < .001, η2P = .71]. Conclusions: The additive rules of integration appeared in the gains scenario while the subtractive rules together with an aversion to inequity were observed in the losses context. \nAuthorship Contribution \nRRC: Conception and design of the study, collection and interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript. \nCSV: Interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript.","PeriodicalId":198006,"journal":{"name":"LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2022.v28n2.534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have evaluated mathematical models of equity judgments of two hypothetical employees with distinct merits. They found that the model of proportionality adequately described the data based on an algebraic additive rule of information integration. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence concerning the effect of a context of monetary losses on the rules of information integration. Objective: To assess the effect of monetary gains and losses on equity judgments, and the effect of the personal context in which the participants are involved in decision-making. Method: A repeated measures design with within-subjects factors was utilized: 7 levels of A’s merit x 5 levels of B’s merit x 2 contexts (gains and losses) x 2 between-subject factors (third-party allocation and self-allocation). Results: Statistically significant differences appeared between thirdparty allocation and self-allocation conditions for gains [F (1,38) = 216.18, p < .001, η2P = .85] and losses [F (1,38) = 110.45, p < .001, η2P = .71]. Conclusions: The additive rules of integration appeared in the gains scenario while the subtractive rules together with an aversion to inequity were observed in the losses context. Authorship Contribution RRC: Conception and design of the study, collection and interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript. CSV: Interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript.
衡平法判决:对利润和损失的背景影响
背景:以往的研究已经评估了两个具有不同优点的假设员工的公平判断的数学模型。他们发现,比例模型充分地描述了基于信息集成的代数加性规则的数据。然而,关于金钱损失的背景对信息整合规则的影响,缺乏证据。目的:评估货币收益和损失对公平判断的影响,以及参与者参与决策的个人环境的影响。方法:采用具有受试者内因素的重复测量设计:7个A的优点水平x 5个B的优点水平x 2个情境(收益和损失)x 2个受试者间因素(第三方分配和自我分配)。结果:收益(F (1,38) = 216.18, p < 0.001, η2P = 0.85)与损失(F (1,38) = 110.45, p < 0.001, η2P = 0.71)的第三方分配与自我分配条件差异有统计学意义。结论:积分的加性规则出现在收益情景中,而减法规则以及对不公平的厌恶在损失情景中被观察到。RRC:研究的构思和设计,数据的收集和解释,讨论,以及手稿的最终修改。CSV:数据解释、讨论和手稿的最终修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信