From austerity to Brexit: the failed populist moment in the UK

Marina Prentoulis
{"title":"From austerity to Brexit: the failed populist moment in the UK","authors":"Marina Prentoulis","doi":"10.3898/soun:81.06.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:After the 2007-8 financial crisis, movements - and later parties - which brought ‘the people’ to the forefront began to dominate the European political scene. These mobilisations brought electoral success for left parties, translating the energies of the movements to the electoral level. Although many people saw Corbynism as a similar political phenomenon, in the UK it was the Brexit campaign that was most successful in constructing a mass popular subjectivity. This article discusses the failure of the anti-austerity mobilisations in Britain to create a transversal popular subjectivity, as happened in Spain and Greece; and it looks at Corbynism within the context of the popular left moment after 2007-8. In particular, it argues that, although the party under Corbyn’s leadership did try to absorb the anti-austerity energy, and ultimately to present it in a manifesto that could bring electoral victory, it did not succeed in this attempt. This was partly because the British anti-austerity movements had not had the same social extent as the movements of the squares in Greece and Spain; partly because the Labour Party has very rarely seen itself, or behaved as, a populist party; and partly because Corbynism did not manage to deal with the challenge of Brexit. But there are also factors outside of the control of the leadership of the party, including the interplay between Corbynism and the Conservatives; the relationship between Corbynism and Momentum; and the nature of the discourses in circulation during this period.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun:81.06.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:After the 2007-8 financial crisis, movements - and later parties - which brought ‘the people’ to the forefront began to dominate the European political scene. These mobilisations brought electoral success for left parties, translating the energies of the movements to the electoral level. Although many people saw Corbynism as a similar political phenomenon, in the UK it was the Brexit campaign that was most successful in constructing a mass popular subjectivity. This article discusses the failure of the anti-austerity mobilisations in Britain to create a transversal popular subjectivity, as happened in Spain and Greece; and it looks at Corbynism within the context of the popular left moment after 2007-8. In particular, it argues that, although the party under Corbyn’s leadership did try to absorb the anti-austerity energy, and ultimately to present it in a manifesto that could bring electoral victory, it did not succeed in this attempt. This was partly because the British anti-austerity movements had not had the same social extent as the movements of the squares in Greece and Spain; partly because the Labour Party has very rarely seen itself, or behaved as, a populist party; and partly because Corbynism did not manage to deal with the challenge of Brexit. But there are also factors outside of the control of the leadership of the party, including the interplay between Corbynism and the Conservatives; the relationship between Corbynism and Momentum; and the nature of the discourses in circulation during this period.
从紧缩到脱欧:英国民粹主义的失败时刻
摘要:在2007- 08年金融危机之后,将“人民”推上前台的运动——以及后来的政党——开始主导欧洲政治舞台。这些动员为左翼政党带来了选举的成功,将运动的能量转化为选举层面。尽管许多人将科尔宾主义视为一种类似的政治现象,但在英国,英国脱欧运动在构建大众主体性方面最为成功。本文讨论了英国反紧缩动员未能像西班牙和希腊那样,创造一种横向的大众主体性;并在2007- 08年之后的流行左翼背景下审视科尔宾主义。特别是,它认为,尽管在科尔宾领导下的工党确实试图吸收反紧缩的能量,并最终将其呈现在一份可能带来选举胜利的宣言中,但这一尝试并未成功。这在一定程度上是因为英国的反紧缩运动没有像希腊和西班牙的广场运动那样具有同样的社会范围;部分原因是工党很少将自己视为民粹主义政党,也很少表现得像民粹主义政党;部分原因是科尔宾主义未能应对英国退欧的挑战。但也有一些不受工党领导层控制的因素,包括科尔宾主义与保守党之间的相互作用;科尔宾主义与动量的关系;以及这一时期流通话语的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信