Identification and Management of Perinatal Depression: Differences between Healthcare Providers

A. Lee-Winn, Charlotte V. Farewell, Claire Ulrickson, Grace Undis, J. Leiferman, J. Huberty
{"title":"Identification and Management of Perinatal Depression: Differences between Healthcare Providers","authors":"A. Lee-Winn, Charlotte V. Farewell, Claire Ulrickson, Grace Undis, J. Leiferman, J. Huberty","doi":"10.31487/j.crogr.2020.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Pilot data was collected to examine providers’ beliefs, knowledge, self-efficacy, barriers, and\npractices related to perinatal depression and how they may differ across provider types.\nBackground: High prevalence and detrimental impact of depression during pregnancy and the first year\npostpartum (i.e. perinatal period) on maternal and child health outcomes highlights the need for improving\ndiagnosis and treatment during this critical period. Healthcare providers play a significant role in helping to\nidentify and manage perinatal depression.\nMethods: Ninety-nine providers (e.g. physicians, nurses, mental health workers, public health practitioners)\nwho provide care to pregnant women in Colorado completed a 64-item online survey.\nResults: Although 94% of providers reported it was their responsibility to recognize perinatal depression,\nvariations across specialties with regards to responsibility to treat were found. Most providers (91%)\nreported use of a screening tool for depression, 60% of providers provide counseling on perinatal depression,\nand 80% of providers refer patients for treatment of perinatal depression on at least a monthly basis.\nSignificant differences in knowledge, self-efficacy, current practices, and perceived patient barriers were\nfound across provider specialties.\nConclusion: These findings highlight the need for expansion of online training programs to increase\nawareness of mental health resources in the community, improve confidence related to diagnosis and\ntreatment of perinatal mood disorders, and to enhance communication between mental health specialists and\nhealthcare providers in order to effectively identify and manage maternal depression.","PeriodicalId":416165,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.crogr.2020.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pilot data was collected to examine providers’ beliefs, knowledge, self-efficacy, barriers, and practices related to perinatal depression and how they may differ across provider types. Background: High prevalence and detrimental impact of depression during pregnancy and the first year postpartum (i.e. perinatal period) on maternal and child health outcomes highlights the need for improving diagnosis and treatment during this critical period. Healthcare providers play a significant role in helping to identify and manage perinatal depression. Methods: Ninety-nine providers (e.g. physicians, nurses, mental health workers, public health practitioners) who provide care to pregnant women in Colorado completed a 64-item online survey. Results: Although 94% of providers reported it was their responsibility to recognize perinatal depression, variations across specialties with regards to responsibility to treat were found. Most providers (91%) reported use of a screening tool for depression, 60% of providers provide counseling on perinatal depression, and 80% of providers refer patients for treatment of perinatal depression on at least a monthly basis. Significant differences in knowledge, self-efficacy, current practices, and perceived patient barriers were found across provider specialties. Conclusion: These findings highlight the need for expansion of online training programs to increase awareness of mental health resources in the community, improve confidence related to diagnosis and treatment of perinatal mood disorders, and to enhance communication between mental health specialists and healthcare providers in order to effectively identify and manage maternal depression.
围产期抑郁症的识别和管理:医疗保健提供者之间的差异
目的:收集试点数据以检查提供者的信念、知识、自我效能、障碍和与围产期抑郁症相关的实践,以及不同提供者类型之间的差异。背景:妊娠期和产后第一年(即围产期)抑郁症的高患病率和对孕产妇和儿童健康结果的有害影响突出了在这一关键时期改善诊断和治疗的必要性。医疗保健提供者在帮助识别和管理围产期抑郁症方面发挥着重要作用。方法:在科罗拉多州为孕妇提供护理的99名提供者(如医生、护士、精神卫生工作者、公共卫生从业人员)完成了一项64项的在线调查。结果:尽管94%的医疗服务提供者报告他们有责任识别围产期抑郁症,但发现不同专业在治疗责任方面存在差异。大多数提供者(91%)报告使用抑郁症筛查工具,60%的提供者提供围产期抑郁症咨询,80%的提供者至少每月转诊一次患者进行围产期抑郁症治疗。在知识、自我效能、当前实践和感知到的患者障碍方面存在显著差异。结论:这些发现强调了扩大在线培训计划的必要性,以提高社区对心理健康资源的认识,提高围产期情绪障碍诊断和治疗的信心,并加强心理健康专家和医疗保健提供者之间的沟通,以有效地识别和管理孕产妇抑郁症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信