The Implementation of Modified Questioning The Author (MQTA) Strategy to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension

Agustiawan Agustiawan, Ujang Suparman, Muhammad Sukirlan
{"title":"The Implementation of Modified Questioning The Author (MQTA) Strategy to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension","authors":"Agustiawan Agustiawan, Ujang Suparman, Muhammad Sukirlan","doi":"10.23960/ujet.v8.i4.201902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed i) to find out whether there was a difference of students’ reading achievement between students taught by using Questioning the Author (QtA) and those taught by using Modified Questioning the Author (MQtA), ii) to find out aspect of reading comprehension which score mostly increased after the implementation of QtA and MQtA, and iii) to find out the students’ responses toward the implementation of MQtA. The subjects of this research were the eighth grade students of SMP IT Ar Raihan Bandar Lampung. The result showed that i) there was a statistically significant difference in students’ reading comprehension achievement between students taught by using QtA and those taught by using MQtA, ii) from five aspects of reading comprehension; determining Main idea, Supporting details, Reference, Inferences and Vocabularies, the reading aspect which gained highest score in experimental group was in determining Main idea and Inferences, while in control group it was in determining References, and iii) the students’ responses toward the implementation of MQtA was positive. It can be said that MQtA strategy is more effective to increase the students’ reading comprehension achievement. However both QtA and MQtA can be implemented to every classroom with different students’ situation and background knowledge.","PeriodicalId":300659,"journal":{"name":"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/ujet.v8.i4.201902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was aimed i) to find out whether there was a difference of students’ reading achievement between students taught by using Questioning the Author (QtA) and those taught by using Modified Questioning the Author (MQtA), ii) to find out aspect of reading comprehension which score mostly increased after the implementation of QtA and MQtA, and iii) to find out the students’ responses toward the implementation of MQtA. The subjects of this research were the eighth grade students of SMP IT Ar Raihan Bandar Lampung. The result showed that i) there was a statistically significant difference in students’ reading comprehension achievement between students taught by using QtA and those taught by using MQtA, ii) from five aspects of reading comprehension; determining Main idea, Supporting details, Reference, Inferences and Vocabularies, the reading aspect which gained highest score in experimental group was in determining Main idea and Inferences, while in control group it was in determining References, and iii) the students’ responses toward the implementation of MQtA was positive. It can be said that MQtA strategy is more effective to increase the students’ reading comprehension achievement. However both QtA and MQtA can be implemented to every classroom with different students’ situation and background knowledge.
实施修正提问作者策略提高学生阅读理解能力
本研究的目的是:1)了解QtA教学与MQtA教学的学生在阅读成绩上是否存在差异;2)了解QtA与MQtA教学后,阅读理解中得分提高最多的方面;3)了解学生对MQtA教学的反应。本研究的对象为南榜市中学的八年级学生。结果显示:(1)使用QtA教学的学生与使用MQtA教学的学生的阅读理解成绩有统计学意义;(2)从阅读理解的五个方面来看;在阅读方面,实验组得分最高的是确定主旨和推论,对照组得分最高的是确定参考文献。iii)学生对MQtA实施的反应是积极的。可以说MQtA策略对于提高学生的阅读理解成绩更为有效。然而,QtA和MQtA都可以实现到每个教室,每个教室都有不同的学生情况和背景知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信