Regulatory Policies for Life Science and Technology Crisis Management: The Comparison of Cases between Korea and Japan

S. Hyeon, Da Young Kim, Min Kyu Lee
{"title":"Regulatory Policies for Life Science and Technology Crisis Management: The Comparison of Cases between Korea and Japan","authors":"S. Hyeon, Da Young Kim, Min Kyu Lee","doi":"10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Korea, bioethics legislation has experienced great fluctuations like a pendulum swinging. After Professor Hwang's research ethics issue, embryonic stem cell research in Korea lost its vitality. In this study, we insist that Korea needs a reference point that is not greatly shaken. We review the establishment of Korea and Japan's life science and ethics-related laws and the operation of their organizations. Then, we compare the strengths and weaknesses of Korea and Japan. Finally, we will propose Korea's strategy to improve bioscience and bioethics systems. In Japan, it is possible to make specific decisions with expertise through the participation of experts. If Korean institutions provide sufficient meeting contents and data at the same level as Japan, deviations will be prevented by making the range of research available to life science researchers predictable. In addition, it will be possible to contribute to the guarantee of Korea's bioethics and safety by increasing the professionalism of civil society to continue monitoring while continuing activities.","PeriodicalId":395795,"journal":{"name":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Korea, bioethics legislation has experienced great fluctuations like a pendulum swinging. After Professor Hwang's research ethics issue, embryonic stem cell research in Korea lost its vitality. In this study, we insist that Korea needs a reference point that is not greatly shaken. We review the establishment of Korea and Japan's life science and ethics-related laws and the operation of their organizations. Then, we compare the strengths and weaknesses of Korea and Japan. Finally, we will propose Korea's strategy to improve bioscience and bioethics systems. In Japan, it is possible to make specific decisions with expertise through the participation of experts. If Korean institutions provide sufficient meeting contents and data at the same level as Japan, deviations will be prevented by making the range of research available to life science researchers predictable. In addition, it will be possible to contribute to the guarantee of Korea's bioethics and safety by increasing the professionalism of civil society to continue monitoring while continuing activities.
生命科学技术危机管理的管制政策:韩国和日本案例比较
在韩国,生命伦理立法像钟摆一样经历了巨大的波动。黄禹锡教授的研究伦理问题之后,韩国的胚胎干细胞研究失去了活力。在这次研究中,我们坚持认为韩国需要一个不太动摇的参照点。”我们回顾韩国和日本的生命科学和伦理相关法律的制定和组织的运作。然后,我们比较韩国和日本的优势和劣势。最后,我们将提出韩国改善生命科学和生命伦理体系的战略。在日本,可以通过专家的参与,以专门知识作出具体决定。如果韩国的研究机构能够提供与日本相同水平的会议内容和数据,生命科学研究人员可以获得的研究范围将变得可预测,从而避免出现偏差。此外,还可以提高市民社会的专业性,在继续进行活动的同时,继续进行监督,为保障韩国的生命伦理和生命安全做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信