The Performance of Music and Speech with Different Frequency Lowering Devices

M. Uys, M. Latzel, M. V. Dyk, Elri Prinsloo
{"title":"The Performance of Music and Speech with Different Frequency Lowering Devices","authors":"M. Uys, M. Latzel, M. V. Dyk, Elri Prinsloo","doi":"10.4172/2375-4427.1000163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Previous research studies have documented the benefits of both frequency transposition (FT) and non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) for patients with different degrees of hearing loss, however, very few studies directly compare the effect of two different frequency lowering (FL) techniques on the same population to investigate if superior performance in terms of speech and music perception exists. \nDesign and Sample: The aim of the study was to determine whether people with a moderate to severe hearing loss have improved music perception and speech intelligibility with the use of FL and if the benefits is dependent on a specific FL strategy. A parallel research design was implemented and a purposive sampling method was used. Participants (n=20) were experienced hearing aid users with bilateral, moderate to severe hearing losses and no FL experience. A music perception questionnaire were completed by participants to rate their perception of music and the Music Perception Test (MPT) were used to assess participants’ musical performance. The Phoneme Perception Test (PPT) and Hearing-in-Noise Test (HINT) were used to assess participants’ speech perception abilities. Two commercial hearing aid devices with different FL approaches (FT and NLFC) were used. \nResults and Conclusion: Results indicate that participants distinguish high frequency sounds better with both FL strategies than without it resulting in better speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise. Greater speech scores with NLFC compared to FT was evident. Participants that used FT showed more confusion regarding speech perception. In terms of music perception the study shows that NLFC improves participants’ pitch and melody perception whereas mostly no musical improvement was observed with FT. With the use of FT participants’ ability to identify melodies decreased. A strong preference to listen to classical music with NLFC compared to FT was noted. Therefore it is evident that FL can improve speech and music perception for people with moderate to severe hearing losses but the perceived benefit seems to be dependent on the specific FL strategy implemented.","PeriodicalId":231062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Previous research studies have documented the benefits of both frequency transposition (FT) and non-linear frequency compression (NLFC) for patients with different degrees of hearing loss, however, very few studies directly compare the effect of two different frequency lowering (FL) techniques on the same population to investigate if superior performance in terms of speech and music perception exists. Design and Sample: The aim of the study was to determine whether people with a moderate to severe hearing loss have improved music perception and speech intelligibility with the use of FL and if the benefits is dependent on a specific FL strategy. A parallel research design was implemented and a purposive sampling method was used. Participants (n=20) were experienced hearing aid users with bilateral, moderate to severe hearing losses and no FL experience. A music perception questionnaire were completed by participants to rate their perception of music and the Music Perception Test (MPT) were used to assess participants’ musical performance. The Phoneme Perception Test (PPT) and Hearing-in-Noise Test (HINT) were used to assess participants’ speech perception abilities. Two commercial hearing aid devices with different FL approaches (FT and NLFC) were used. Results and Conclusion: Results indicate that participants distinguish high frequency sounds better with both FL strategies than without it resulting in better speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise. Greater speech scores with NLFC compared to FT was evident. Participants that used FT showed more confusion regarding speech perception. In terms of music perception the study shows that NLFC improves participants’ pitch and melody perception whereas mostly no musical improvement was observed with FT. With the use of FT participants’ ability to identify melodies decreased. A strong preference to listen to classical music with NLFC compared to FT was noted. Therefore it is evident that FL can improve speech and music perception for people with moderate to severe hearing losses but the perceived benefit seems to be dependent on the specific FL strategy implemented.
不同降频装置对音乐和语音的影响
目的:以往的研究已经记录了频率转换(FT)和非线性频率压缩(NLFC)对不同程度听力损失患者的益处,然而,很少有研究直接比较两种不同的降频(FL)技术对同一人群的影响,以调查是否存在语音和音乐感知方面的优越表现。设计和样本:研究的目的是确定中度至重度听力损失的人是否通过使用助听器改善了音乐感知和语言清晰度,以及这种好处是否依赖于特定的助听器策略。采用平行研究设计和目的抽样方法。参与者(n=20)是有经验的助听器使用者,双侧,中度至重度听力损失,没有FL经验。参与者完成了一份音乐感知问卷来评估他们对音乐的感知,并使用音乐感知测试(MPT)来评估参与者的音乐表演。采用音素感知测验(PPT)和噪音听力测验(HINT)评估被试的语音感知能力。我们使用了两种商用助听器(FT和NLFC)。结果与结论:实验结果表明,使用两种辅音策略的被试对高频音的分辨能力都优于不使用辅音策略的被试,从而在安静和噪音环境下获得更好的语音清晰度。与FT相比,NLFC的语音分数明显更高。使用FT的参与者在语音感知方面表现出更多的困惑。在音乐感知方面,研究表明NLFC提高了参与者的音调和旋律感知,而FT基本上没有观察到音乐方面的改善。随着FT的使用,参与者识别旋律的能力下降。与FT相比,NLFC更倾向于听古典音乐。因此,很明显,FL可以改善中度至重度听力损失患者的语言和音乐感知,但感知到的好处似乎取决于实施的具体FL策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信