Effects of remedial actions on LMPs

Fang Yang, A. Meliopoulos, G. Stefopoulos
{"title":"Effects of remedial actions on LMPs","authors":"Fang Yang, A. Meliopoulos, G. Stefopoulos","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locational marginal pricing (LMP) has been deployed by several wholesale markets in United States. Standard market design (SMD) proposed by FERC has also adopted LMP as the foundation for the open market power industry, LMP values are influenced by system operating conditions. If system is unconstrained, LMP values are flat throughout the network. When system is constrained, because of congestion or abnormal voltages, LMP values differentiate at various locations. Their values reflect the increased cost to deliver energy from marginal units to load buses. For speed and simplicity, most LMP models include merely constraints of transmission congestion and consider the generator unit real power output rescheduling as the only way to alleviate transmission congestion. However, in typical power systems there are other types of remedial actions (RAs) that can be applied to alleviate or eliminate system constraints. These RAs include shunt capacitor/reactor switching, transformer tap/phase shifter adjustment, etc. Remedial actions can affect LMPs by virtue of their effect on system active constraints. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of remedial actions in smoothing LMP values. We propose an LMP computational models that includes RA effects as well as congestion and voltage constraints. The formulation of the problem is based on the single phase quadratized AC power flow model. The problem is linearized using the efficient co-state method leading to a standard linear program which is solved with standard techniques. An example power system is used to demonstrate the proposed framework. LMP values with and without RAs are computed and compared. Results show that effect of RAs on LMP is noteworthy and appropriate RAs can effectively flatten LMP values.","PeriodicalId":101495,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2005.1560568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Locational marginal pricing (LMP) has been deployed by several wholesale markets in United States. Standard market design (SMD) proposed by FERC has also adopted LMP as the foundation for the open market power industry, LMP values are influenced by system operating conditions. If system is unconstrained, LMP values are flat throughout the network. When system is constrained, because of congestion or abnormal voltages, LMP values differentiate at various locations. Their values reflect the increased cost to deliver energy from marginal units to load buses. For speed and simplicity, most LMP models include merely constraints of transmission congestion and consider the generator unit real power output rescheduling as the only way to alleviate transmission congestion. However, in typical power systems there are other types of remedial actions (RAs) that can be applied to alleviate or eliminate system constraints. These RAs include shunt capacitor/reactor switching, transformer tap/phase shifter adjustment, etc. Remedial actions can affect LMPs by virtue of their effect on system active constraints. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of remedial actions in smoothing LMP values. We propose an LMP computational models that includes RA effects as well as congestion and voltage constraints. The formulation of the problem is based on the single phase quadratized AC power flow model. The problem is linearized using the efficient co-state method leading to a standard linear program which is solved with standard techniques. An example power system is used to demonstrate the proposed framework. LMP values with and without RAs are computed and compared. Results show that effect of RAs on LMP is noteworthy and appropriate RAs can effectively flatten LMP values.
治疗措施对LMPs的影响
位置边际定价(LMP)已在美国的几个批发市场部署。FERC提出的标准市场设计(SMD)也采用LMP作为开放市场电力行业的基础,LMP值受系统运行条件的影响。如果系统不受约束,则LMP值在整个网络中是平坦的。当系统受到约束时,由于拥塞或电压异常,LMP值在不同位置会发生差异。它们的值反映了将能量从边际单元输送到负载总线的成本增加。为了速度和简单,大多数LMP模型仅包含传输拥塞约束,并将发电机组实际输出功率重调度作为缓解传输拥塞的唯一途径。然而,在典型的电力系统中,还有其他类型的补救措施(RAs)可以用于减轻或消除系统约束。这些ra包括并联电容器/电抗器开关,变压器抽头/移相器调整等。补救措施可以通过对系统活动约束的影响来影响lmp。在本文中,我们检验了补救措施在平滑LMP值方面的有效性。我们提出了一个LMP计算模型,包括RA效应以及拥塞和电压约束。该问题的表述基于单相二次化交流潮流模型。用有效共态法对问题进行线性化,得到一个标准的线性规划,用标准技术求解。最后以一个电力系统为例,对所提出的框架进行了验证。计算和比较有和没有RAs的LMP值。结果表明,RAs对LMP的影响是显著的,适当的RAs可以有效地使LMP值趋于平缓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信