PRETRIAL DIVERSION SCREENING

William G. Matthews Ma
{"title":"PRETRIAL DIVERSION SCREENING","authors":"William G. Matthews Ma","doi":"10.1300/J264V04N04_08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of implementing a prosecutorially-based diversion program is examined with respect to the unintended and unanticipaled results occurring from the decision-making process inherent in the client selection process. Sentencing records are examined on a population of both misdemeanor and felony cases, and the results analyzed according to whether the defendant voluntarily rejected participation, contrasted with the defendant who was \"officially \" denied diversion status. The results suggest that those defendants who are officially rejected from diversion participation are treated more seriously and more harshly by the criminal justice system. The results are explained in terms of an information theory approach, suggesting that the diversion mechanism may contribute to deviance amplification.","PeriodicalId":107632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of offender counseling, services & rehabilitation","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of offender counseling, services & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J264V04N04_08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The impact of implementing a prosecutorially-based diversion program is examined with respect to the unintended and unanticipaled results occurring from the decision-making process inherent in the client selection process. Sentencing records are examined on a population of both misdemeanor and felony cases, and the results analyzed according to whether the defendant voluntarily rejected participation, contrasted with the defendant who was "officially " denied diversion status. The results suggest that those defendants who are officially rejected from diversion participation are treated more seriously and more harshly by the criminal justice system. The results are explained in terms of an information theory approach, suggesting that the diversion mechanism may contribute to deviance amplification.
审前分流筛选
根据客户选择过程中固有的决策过程中发生的意外和意外结果,对实施以起诉为基础的转移方案的影响进行了审查。对轻罪和重罪案件的宣判记录进行审查,并根据被告是否自愿拒绝参与,与被告“正式”拒绝转移身份进行对比,对结果进行分析。结果表明,那些被正式拒绝参与转移的被告受到刑事司法系统更严重和更严厉的对待。从信息论的角度解释了这一结果,表明转移机制可能有助于偏差放大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信