Analysis of Standardization and Guidelines for Facility Condition Assessments

Derek Hillestad, K. Sullivan, Kristen Hurtado, Steven K. Ayer, Jake B. Smithwick
{"title":"Analysis of Standardization and Guidelines for Facility Condition Assessments","authors":"Derek Hillestad, K. Sullivan, Kristen Hurtado, Steven K. Ayer, Jake B. Smithwick","doi":"10.22361/jfmer/151122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Facility Condition Assessments (FCA's) in the facility management (FM) profession is a growing area of research. However, delivery methods of FCA projects and studies on standardization has largely not been a focus of further exploration. Thus, this research aims to identify a current state of academic research on standardization of condition assessments and FM practitioner perspectives on FCA delivery methods and standardization. Results revealed 75% of participants indicated that no standards were used in conducting their FCA. This study identifies underutilization of standards and guidelines to conduct an FCA and leads to the proposal of three FCA project delivery methods; 1. Conduct FCA's with in-house personnel and resources; 2. Outsource the FCA to a service provider; 3. Hybrid the approach with both in-house and contracted FCA service providers. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing FCA project delivery methods for owners and or operators to consider when deciding to pursue an FCA project. Further, the apparent absence of standards and guidelines use in the practice of FCA's in the FM profession presents an opportunity for future research efforts towards FCA standardization.","PeriodicalId":168480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facility Management Education and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facility Management Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22361/jfmer/151122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facility Condition Assessments (FCA's) in the facility management (FM) profession is a growing area of research. However, delivery methods of FCA projects and studies on standardization has largely not been a focus of further exploration. Thus, this research aims to identify a current state of academic research on standardization of condition assessments and FM practitioner perspectives on FCA delivery methods and standardization. Results revealed 75% of participants indicated that no standards were used in conducting their FCA. This study identifies underutilization of standards and guidelines to conduct an FCA and leads to the proposal of three FCA project delivery methods; 1. Conduct FCA's with in-house personnel and resources; 2. Outsource the FCA to a service provider; 3. Hybrid the approach with both in-house and contracted FCA service providers. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing FCA project delivery methods for owners and or operators to consider when deciding to pursue an FCA project. Further, the apparent absence of standards and guidelines use in the practice of FCA's in the FM profession presents an opportunity for future research efforts towards FCA standardization.
设施状态评估标准化及导则分析
设施状况评估(FCA)在设施管理(FM)行业是一个新兴的研究领域。然而,FCA项目的交付方式和标准化研究在很大程度上还没有成为进一步探索的重点。因此,本研究的目的是确定条件评估标准化的学术研究现状,以及FM从业者对FCA交付方法和标准化的看法。结果显示,75%的参与者表示在进行FCA时没有使用任何标准。本研究确定了进行FCA的标准和指南的利用不足,并提出了三种FCA项目交付方法;1. 利用内部人员和资源开展FCA;2. 将FCA外包给服务提供商;3.将这种方法与内部和合同FCA服务提供商相结合。本研究提出了FCA项目交付方法,供业主和/或运营商在决定实施FCA项目时考虑,从而为知识体系做出了贡献。此外,FCA在FM行业实践中明显缺乏标准和指南,这为未来FCA标准化的研究工作提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信