Analisis Fikih Aktual dan Hipotesis Atas Eksposisi Eksistensi Artificial Intelligence dalam Transaksi

Rahmat Hidayat
{"title":"Analisis Fikih Aktual dan Hipotesis Atas Eksposisi Eksistensi Artificial Intelligence dalam Transaksi","authors":"Rahmat Hidayat","doi":"10.30651/justeko.v5i2.10340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine Islamic law on AI (artificial intelligence) in transactions. In this era, AI has entered into various sectors of commerce. Many large companies have used AI in various functions and roles.  So it is necessary to study the legal impact of AI in transaction. This research uses a normative method with a conceptual approach. In transactions, weak AI has occupied at least three positions out of four possible positions, as objects, tools and limited agent. Meanwhile, strong AI, which occupies a position as an independent entity, does not yet exist at this time. At least three positions can be measured actually and one position can be measured hypothetically. Weak AI as objects, tools and limited agent is punished by rules related to its position. But in general, the blame for the AI in these three positions lies with the provider and not the AI itself. Meanwhile, AI as an independent entity, if it is analogous to the general rules of transactions, then all the consequences of his wrongful actions will be charged to him. Because the error is the result of the ability of think independently. The punishment that can be applied is punishment within the scope of ta'zir that is adjusted to government regulations as well as scientific research on the limits of AI intelligence.","PeriodicalId":402140,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika: Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v5i2.10340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine Islamic law on AI (artificial intelligence) in transactions. In this era, AI has entered into various sectors of commerce. Many large companies have used AI in various functions and roles.  So it is necessary to study the legal impact of AI in transaction. This research uses a normative method with a conceptual approach. In transactions, weak AI has occupied at least three positions out of four possible positions, as objects, tools and limited agent. Meanwhile, strong AI, which occupies a position as an independent entity, does not yet exist at this time. At least three positions can be measured actually and one position can be measured hypothetically. Weak AI as objects, tools and limited agent is punished by rules related to its position. But in general, the blame for the AI in these three positions lies with the provider and not the AI itself. Meanwhile, AI as an independent entity, if it is analogous to the general rules of transactions, then all the consequences of his wrongful actions will be charged to him. Because the error is the result of the ability of think independently. The punishment that can be applied is punishment within the scope of ta'zir that is adjusted to government regulations as well as scientific research on the limits of AI intelligence.
交易中人工智能存在的真实复杂性分析和假设
这项研究的目的是确定伊斯兰教法对交易中的人工智能(AI)的规定。在这个时代,人工智能已经进入了商业的各个领域。许多大公司已经在各种职能和角色中使用人工智能。因此,有必要研究人工智能在交易中的法律影响。本研究采用规范性方法和概念性方法。在交易中,弱人工智能至少占据了四个可能位置中的三个位置,作为对象、工具和有限代理。同时,目前还不存在具有独立实体地位的强人工智能。实际可以测量至少三个位置,假设可以测量一个位置。作为对象、工具和有限代理的弱AI受到与其位置相关的规则的惩罚。但总的来说,这三个位置上的人工智能的责任在于提供者,而不是人工智能本身。同时,人工智能作为一个独立的实体,如果它类似于一般的交易规则,那么他的所有错误行为的后果将被指控给他。因为错误是独立思考能力的结果。可以适用的惩罚是根据政府规定调整的“塔兹尔”范围内的惩罚,以及对人工智能极限的科学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信