Mesa redonda: Papel de la inspección en la innovación educativa

Santiago Esteban Frades, Avelino Sarasúa Ortega, J. Rubio, Manuel Zulueta Castañeda
{"title":"Mesa redonda: Papel de la inspección en la innovación educativa","authors":"Santiago Esteban Frades, Avelino Sarasúa Ortega, J. Rubio, Manuel Zulueta Castañeda","doi":"10.23824/ASE.V0I26.580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A summary of the round table discussion developed in The Congress of Education Inspectors held in October 2016 in Valladolid. The main ideas that were discussed were how throughout the history of the Inspectors have always been involved in innovation and how the \"White Paper of the teaching profession and its School environment\" is that the inspection becomes a significant agent of the educational change. A methodological change is urgently needed in classrooms and centers with a work by competencies, the inspection should, through control and supervision, verify that these innovations are being carried out. That paradigmatic change that is being happening in the educational field requires a rethinking of the inspection functions and the new role that inspectors must assume, taking into account that there are different inspections in Europe that are already changing the model. Some Autonomous Regions are publishing innovation rules and granting inspection to their monitoring and evaluation systems. There are three possible and compatible models of performance of the innovative inspection: one, based on the control and supervision so that apply the rule that makes innovation possible; another, which is to enable the pedagogical autonomy of the centers; And the third model of collaboration and involvement in the innovation of the centers. It is dangerous for inspection to be dedicated only to the main functions are those of control and supervision and avoid oversaturation of many actions that are not his own. There must be a leadership and coordination on the part of the inspection of educational services that involve the centers, but points out the danger that this may dilute the inspection role. The inspection would have to have more pedagogical training in order to do their job well and have more influence in the centers and the faculty.","PeriodicalId":167213,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Supervisión Educativa","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Supervisión Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23824/ASE.V0I26.580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A summary of the round table discussion developed in The Congress of Education Inspectors held in October 2016 in Valladolid. The main ideas that were discussed were how throughout the history of the Inspectors have always been involved in innovation and how the "White Paper of the teaching profession and its School environment" is that the inspection becomes a significant agent of the educational change. A methodological change is urgently needed in classrooms and centers with a work by competencies, the inspection should, through control and supervision, verify that these innovations are being carried out. That paradigmatic change that is being happening in the educational field requires a rethinking of the inspection functions and the new role that inspectors must assume, taking into account that there are different inspections in Europe that are already changing the model. Some Autonomous Regions are publishing innovation rules and granting inspection to their monitoring and evaluation systems. There are three possible and compatible models of performance of the innovative inspection: one, based on the control and supervision so that apply the rule that makes innovation possible; another, which is to enable the pedagogical autonomy of the centers; And the third model of collaboration and involvement in the innovation of the centers. It is dangerous for inspection to be dedicated only to the main functions are those of control and supervision and avoid oversaturation of many actions that are not his own. There must be a leadership and coordination on the part of the inspection of educational services that involve the centers, but points out the danger that this may dilute the inspection role. The inspection would have to have more pedagogical training in order to do their job well and have more influence in the centers and the faculty.
圆桌会议:检查在教育创新中的作用
2016年10月在巴利亚多利德举行的教育督察大会圆桌讨论总结。会议讨论的主要观点是,在督察的整个历史中,督察如何始终参与创新,以及“教学专业及其学校环境白皮书”如何使督察成为教育变革的重要推动者。按能力工作的教室和中心迫切需要改变方法,检查应通过控制和监督来验证这些创新正在进行。教育领域正在发生的这种范式变化需要重新考虑检查职能和检查员必须承担的新角色,同时考虑到欧洲已经有不同的检查正在改变这种模式。一些自治区出台创新管理办法,对监测评价体系进行检查。创新检查有三种可能且相容的绩效模式:一是以控制和监督为基础,运用使创新成为可能的规则;另一个是使中心的教学自主性;第三种合作和参与中心创新的模式。检查只致力于控制和监督的主要职能,而避免许多不属于他自己的行为过饱和,这是危险的。对包括各中心在内的教育服务监督,必须有领导和协调作用,但这有可能削弱监督作用。”检查员必须接受更多的教学培训,以便更好地完成他们的工作,并对中心和教师产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信