Comparative analysis of laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy combined with provisional clamping of internal iliac arteries, urethrocystoanastomosis and transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia

S. Volkov, R. K. Mikheev, O. Grigoryan, V. Tereshchenko, V. S. Stepanchenko, E. Andreeva, K. Kolontarev
{"title":"Comparative analysis of laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy combined with provisional clamping of internal iliac arteries, urethrocystoanastomosis and transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia","authors":"S. Volkov, R. K. Mikheev, O. Grigoryan, V. Tereshchenko, V. S. Stepanchenko, E. Andreeva, K. Kolontarev","doi":"10.17650/2070-9781-2023-24-2-109-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To provide comparative analysis of laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy combined with provisional clamping of internal iliac arteries, uretherocystoanastomosis (LRP + CIIA + UCA) and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) for surgical treatment benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and methods. 103 patients of age ³40 years old with refracted symptoms of urinary tract compression caused by BPH. The period of observation: from 2019 until the May 20, 2022; 48 and 51 patients were primary observed before and 6 months after LRP + CIIA + UCA and TURP. Criteria of inclusion: prostatic volume 60–80 cm3.Pre-operative treatment included such parameters as prostate-specific antigen level. Volume of prostate, volume of residual urine, urodynamic parameters, IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) + quality of life (QoL) scale result. Postoperative observation after 6 months included uroflowmetry, residual urine volume, evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms and their influence on IPSS and QoL scale result. Efficacy of treatment of BPH is a summary of all earlier described parameters.Results. Symptomatic regression in patients who underwent LRP + CIIA + UCA and TURP was found among 15 (93.75 %) and 13 (81.25 %) patients relatively; complications distributed throughout 1, 2 and 3 classes by Clavien-Dindo criteria: after TURP – among 71.4, 22.9 and 5.7 % patients, after LPA + CIIA + UCA – among 35.4, 24.2 and 11.3 %, relatively. After 6 months maximal urine flow improved up to 22.7 ± 2.2 ml/seс, 16.8 ± 1.5 ml/seс, relatively.Conclusion. LRP + CIIA + UCA is effective for urodynamic and life quality improvement like TURP. LRP + CIIA + UCA has shown statistically significant advantages of such parameters as blood loss, bladder neck contractures and urethral strictures.","PeriodicalId":368206,"journal":{"name":"Andrology and Genital Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrology and Genital Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2023-24-2-109-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To provide comparative analysis of laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy combined with provisional clamping of internal iliac arteries, uretherocystoanastomosis (LRP + CIIA + UCA) and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) for surgical treatment benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and methods. 103 patients of age ³40 years old with refracted symptoms of urinary tract compression caused by BPH. The period of observation: from 2019 until the May 20, 2022; 48 and 51 patients were primary observed before and 6 months after LRP + CIIA + UCA and TURP. Criteria of inclusion: prostatic volume 60–80 cm3.Pre-operative treatment included such parameters as prostate-specific antigen level. Volume of prostate, volume of residual urine, urodynamic parameters, IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) + quality of life (QoL) scale result. Postoperative observation after 6 months included uroflowmetry, residual urine volume, evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms and their influence on IPSS and QoL scale result. Efficacy of treatment of BPH is a summary of all earlier described parameters.Results. Symptomatic regression in patients who underwent LRP + CIIA + UCA and TURP was found among 15 (93.75 %) and 13 (81.25 %) patients relatively; complications distributed throughout 1, 2 and 3 classes by Clavien-Dindo criteria: after TURP – among 71.4, 22.9 and 5.7 % patients, after LPA + CIIA + UCA – among 35.4, 24.2 and 11.3 %, relatively. After 6 months maximal urine flow improved up to 22.7 ± 2.2 ml/seс, 16.8 ± 1.5 ml/seс, relatively.Conclusion. LRP + CIIA + UCA is effective for urodynamic and life quality improvement like TURP. LRP + CIIA + UCA has shown statistically significant advantages of such parameters as blood loss, bladder neck contractures and urethral strictures.
腹腔镜耻骨后单纯性前列腺切除术联合髂内动脉临时夹持、尿道吻合术与经尿道良性前列腺增生切除术的比较分析
的目标。目的:比较分析腹腔镜耻骨后单纯性前列腺切除术联合髂内动脉临时夹持、输尿管膀胱吻合术(LRP + CIIA + UCA)和经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的效果。材料和方法。103例40岁以下前列腺增生引起的尿路压迫折射症状患者。观察期:2019年至2022年5月20日;在LRP + CIIA + UCA和TURP术前和术后6个月分别观察48例和51例患者。纳入标准:前列腺体积60-80 cm3。术前治疗包括前列腺特异性抗原水平等参数。前列腺体积、残尿量、尿动力学参数、IPSS(国际前列腺症状评分)+生活质量(QoL)量表结果。术后6个月观察尿流、残尿量、评估下尿路症状及其对IPSS和QoL评分结果的影响。治疗前列腺增生的疗效是所有前面描述的参数的总结。LRP + CIIA + UCA和TURP患者分别有15例(93.75%)和13例(81.25%)出现症状缓解;根据Clavien-Dindo标准,并发症分布在1、2和3个分类中:TURP后分别为71.4%、22.9%和5.7%,LPA + CIIA + UCA后分别为35.4%、24.2%和11.3%。6个月后最大尿流量分别为22.7±2.2 ml/ sev, 16.8±1.5 ml/ sev。LRP + CIIA + UCA与TURP一样有效改善尿动力学和生活质量。LRP + CIIA + UCA在失血量、膀胱颈挛缩、尿道狭窄等参数上具有统计学上的显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信