Effect of Filter Type and Filter Size on Roundness/Circularity Measurement Using Different Mathematical Algorithms

C. Sahay, Suhash Ghosh, J. Premkumar, Sivaraj Ramachandran
{"title":"Effect of Filter Type and Filter Size on Roundness/Circularity Measurement Using Different Mathematical Algorithms","authors":"C. Sahay, Suhash Ghosh, J. Premkumar, Sivaraj Ramachandran","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2020-23575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the manufacturing industry, it is almost inconceivable to produce a rotating component without a minimal amount of roundness tolerance. The importance of studying roundness form deviations of circular and cylindrical features is to avoid the excessive lateral or axial runout deviations of the rotating and reciprocating parts during dynamic operations. Considering the precision that industries require now and will require in the future, the authors of this article have chosen roundness (also called circularity per ASME Standards) as the measurable parameter. In order to arrive at precise results, the roundness of a near-to-perfect cylinder is measured on an accurate spindle and turn-table type measuring instrument. Roundness profile, when measured, can be filtered in various ways to reduce or eliminate unwanted details, with a cut-off value set in terms of undulations per revolution (UPR), which gives valuable information about how the component may function, under specific conditions. Looking at real-life roundness graphs it is clear that information exists in the data at different frequencies. A classic example is ovality, which indicates an irregularity that occurs two times in one complete revolution. The workpiece would be said to have two lobes or two UPR. Multiple lobes may be present on a component, a condition contributing to either problems of fit with mating components or part functionality. Additionally, usage of recommended or generalized filter, yields data that approximately lies in the range of acceptability. Thus, there is a strong need to thoroughly understand the effect of filter size and type on roundness (form error for fit) and part functionality. Many published articles have investigated novel filters to accurately and efficiently calculate roundness. However, no work was found in literature that would present the filter size and type selection criteria and correlate it with roundness depending on mathematical method of calculating roundness and further to part functionality. This paper focusses on the investigation of filter type and size effect on roundness based on different mathematical methods of roundness error calculations. By varying parameters like the filter type (Gaussian 50%, 75% and RC Filters), the filter sizes (1 through 500 UPR) and the methods of measuring the roundness — (Least Squares Circle (LSC), Minimum Circumscribed Circle (MCC), Maximum Inscribed Circle (MIC) and Minimum Zone Circles or Separation (MZC or MZS)), roundness at different heights of the workpiece is evaluated. A clear trend is observed from the results, which can further help one to choose filters and their respective sizes for the respective design intent or the application in question.","PeriodicalId":187039,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020-23575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the manufacturing industry, it is almost inconceivable to produce a rotating component without a minimal amount of roundness tolerance. The importance of studying roundness form deviations of circular and cylindrical features is to avoid the excessive lateral or axial runout deviations of the rotating and reciprocating parts during dynamic operations. Considering the precision that industries require now and will require in the future, the authors of this article have chosen roundness (also called circularity per ASME Standards) as the measurable parameter. In order to arrive at precise results, the roundness of a near-to-perfect cylinder is measured on an accurate spindle and turn-table type measuring instrument. Roundness profile, when measured, can be filtered in various ways to reduce or eliminate unwanted details, with a cut-off value set in terms of undulations per revolution (UPR), which gives valuable information about how the component may function, under specific conditions. Looking at real-life roundness graphs it is clear that information exists in the data at different frequencies. A classic example is ovality, which indicates an irregularity that occurs two times in one complete revolution. The workpiece would be said to have two lobes or two UPR. Multiple lobes may be present on a component, a condition contributing to either problems of fit with mating components or part functionality. Additionally, usage of recommended or generalized filter, yields data that approximately lies in the range of acceptability. Thus, there is a strong need to thoroughly understand the effect of filter size and type on roundness (form error for fit) and part functionality. Many published articles have investigated novel filters to accurately and efficiently calculate roundness. However, no work was found in literature that would present the filter size and type selection criteria and correlate it with roundness depending on mathematical method of calculating roundness and further to part functionality. This paper focusses on the investigation of filter type and size effect on roundness based on different mathematical methods of roundness error calculations. By varying parameters like the filter type (Gaussian 50%, 75% and RC Filters), the filter sizes (1 through 500 UPR) and the methods of measuring the roundness — (Least Squares Circle (LSC), Minimum Circumscribed Circle (MCC), Maximum Inscribed Circle (MIC) and Minimum Zone Circles or Separation (MZC or MZS)), roundness at different heights of the workpiece is evaluated. A clear trend is observed from the results, which can further help one to choose filters and their respective sizes for the respective design intent or the application in question.
不同数学算法下滤波器类型和尺寸对圆度/圆度测量的影响
在制造业中,要生产一个没有最小圆度公差的旋转部件几乎是不可想象的。研究圆弧和圆柱特征的圆度形式偏差的重要性在于避免在动态运行中旋转和往复部件的横向或轴向跳动偏差过大。考虑到工业现在和将来对精度的要求,本文的作者选择圆度(也称为ASME标准中的圆度)作为可测量参数。为了获得精确的结果,在精确的主轴和转台式测量仪器上测量近乎完美的圆柱体的圆度。测量圆度轮廓时,可以通过各种方式进行过滤,以减少或消除不需要的细节,并根据每旋转波动(UPR)设置截止值,这可以提供有关组件在特定条件下如何工作的有价值信息。看看现实生活中的圆度图,很明显,数据中存在不同频率的信息。一个典型的例子是椭圆性,它表示在一次完整的旋转中出现两次不规则性。工件将被称为有两个叶或两个UPR。一个部件上可能存在多个裂片,这种情况会导致与配套部件的配合问题或部件功能问题。此外,使用推荐的或通用的过滤器,产生的数据大致处于可接受的范围内。因此,有一个强烈的需要,彻底了解过滤器的尺寸和类型对圆度(形状误差配合)和零件功能的影响。许多已发表的文章研究了新的滤波器来准确有效地计算圆度。然而,在文献中没有发现任何工作,将提出过滤器大小和类型选择标准,并将其与圆度相关联,这取决于计算圆度的数学方法和进一步的部分功能。基于不同的圆度误差计算数学方法,重点研究了滤波器类型和尺寸对圆度的影响。通过改变参数,如过滤器类型(高斯50%,75%和RC过滤器),过滤器尺寸(1到500 UPR)和测量圆度的方法-(最小二乘圆(LSC),最小外接圆(MCC),最大内切圆(MIC)和最小区域圆或分离(MZC或MZS)),评估工件不同高度的圆度。从结果中可以观察到一个明显的趋势,这可以进一步帮助人们为各自的设计意图或所讨论的应用程序选择滤波器及其各自的尺寸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信