Digitization of Socio-Political Interaction: Mobilization of Real and Virtual Communication

Natal'ya Nyatina, Nikita N. Grigorik, Artem Molchanov
{"title":"Digitization of Socio-Political Interaction: Mobilization of Real and Virtual Communication","authors":"Natal'ya Nyatina, Nikita N. Grigorik, Artem Molchanov","doi":"10.21603/2782-4799-2023-2-3-167-174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital communication allows almost every subject of social and political interaction to act as a communicator, interpreter, and broadcaster of information. Online users can also act as petitioners, appealing to the authorities, other citizens, opinion leaders, experts, etc. Government representatives are interpreters and administrators of political decisions. Digital communication gives them an opportunity to demonstrate their social positions, citizenship, solidarity, and attitudes. And this is where the following contradiction arrives. On the one hand, the authorities need to mobilize real and virtual communication. On the other hand, they perceive mobilized population as a threat: to be controlled, organized social communities require resources, as well as complex and expensive measures. The authors reviewed publications that featured socio-political interaction. The review revealed that the mobilization of civic participation remains understudied. Digitalization increases the importance and relevance of network practices of social activism. Traditional forms of interaction between community members and authorities are gradually being replaced by networked, flexible, and participatory ones. Constructive and destructive forms of mobilization transform socio-political relations. The review provided a diversification of constructive and destructive practices of public participation in decision-making at federal, regional, local, and company levels. Digital forms and methods of socio-political interaction increase in number, and theri measurement indicators keep changing.","PeriodicalId":359429,"journal":{"name":"Virtual Communication and Social Networks","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual Communication and Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2023-2-3-167-174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Digital communication allows almost every subject of social and political interaction to act as a communicator, interpreter, and broadcaster of information. Online users can also act as petitioners, appealing to the authorities, other citizens, opinion leaders, experts, etc. Government representatives are interpreters and administrators of political decisions. Digital communication gives them an opportunity to demonstrate their social positions, citizenship, solidarity, and attitudes. And this is where the following contradiction arrives. On the one hand, the authorities need to mobilize real and virtual communication. On the other hand, they perceive mobilized population as a threat: to be controlled, organized social communities require resources, as well as complex and expensive measures. The authors reviewed publications that featured socio-political interaction. The review revealed that the mobilization of civic participation remains understudied. Digitalization increases the importance and relevance of network practices of social activism. Traditional forms of interaction between community members and authorities are gradually being replaced by networked, flexible, and participatory ones. Constructive and destructive forms of mobilization transform socio-political relations. The review provided a diversification of constructive and destructive practices of public participation in decision-making at federal, regional, local, and company levels. Digital forms and methods of socio-political interaction increase in number, and theri measurement indicators keep changing.
社会政治互动的数位化:真实与虚拟沟通的动员
数字通信使得几乎每一个社会和政治互动的主体都能充当信息的传播者、解释者和传播者。网上用户还可以作为上访者,向当局、其他公民、意见领袖、专家等上访。政府代表是政治决策的口译员和执行者。数字通信使他们有机会展示自己的社会地位、公民身份、团结和态度。这就引出了下面的矛盾。一方面,当局需要调动真实和虚拟的交流。另一方面,他们认为动员起来的人口是一种威胁:要加以控制,有组织的社会社区需要资源以及复杂和昂贵的措施。作者回顾了以社会政治互动为特色的出版物。审查显示,动员公民参与的问题仍未得到充分研究。数字化增加了社会行动主义网络实践的重要性和相关性。社区成员和当局之间的传统互动形式正逐渐被网络化、灵活和参与性的互动形式所取代。建设性和破坏性的动员形式改变了社会政治关系。审查提供了在联邦、地区、地方和公司各级公众参与决策的建设性和破坏性做法的多样化。政治社会互动的数字化形式和方法不断增多,衡量指标也在不断变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信