Comparative Value Relevance Among German, U.S. And International Accounting Standards: A German Stock Market Perspective

Eli Bartov, Stephen R. Goldberg, Myungsun Kim
{"title":"Comparative Value Relevance Among German, U.S. And International Accounting Standards: A German Stock Market Perspective","authors":"Eli Bartov, Stephen R. Goldberg, Myungsun Kim","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.316525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, German companies report consolidated financial statements under German GAAP, U.S. GAAP, or International Accounting Standards (IAS). Market observers, researchers, and regulators have argued that financial statements prepared under the shareholder (or investor) model, such as U.S. GAAP or IAS, provide better information than financial statements prepared under the stakeholder model (German GAAP). They further have argued that U.S. GAAP is more rigorously defined and, therefore, provides superior information to IAS. We investigate comparative value relevance, measured as the slope coefficient of the returns/earnings regression. Our results are consistent with expectations. Within our sample of German companies traded on German stock exchanges, value relevance of U.S. GAAP based earnings is higher than that of IAS based earnings, which in turn is more value relevant than earnings produced under German GAAP. A major contribution of this research is that, unlike prior research, we measure stock returns for all sample firms in the German stock market only, and therefore are not reliant on the perhaps strong assumption underlying prior studies of similarity of pricing across markets domiciled in different countries.","PeriodicalId":124312,"journal":{"name":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"522","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New York University Stern School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.316525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 522

Abstract

In recent years, German companies report consolidated financial statements under German GAAP, U.S. GAAP, or International Accounting Standards (IAS). Market observers, researchers, and regulators have argued that financial statements prepared under the shareholder (or investor) model, such as U.S. GAAP or IAS, provide better information than financial statements prepared under the stakeholder model (German GAAP). They further have argued that U.S. GAAP is more rigorously defined and, therefore, provides superior information to IAS. We investigate comparative value relevance, measured as the slope coefficient of the returns/earnings regression. Our results are consistent with expectations. Within our sample of German companies traded on German stock exchanges, value relevance of U.S. GAAP based earnings is higher than that of IAS based earnings, which in turn is more value relevant than earnings produced under German GAAP. A major contribution of this research is that, unlike prior research, we measure stock returns for all sample firms in the German stock market only, and therefore are not reliant on the perhaps strong assumption underlying prior studies of similarity of pricing across markets domiciled in different countries.
德国、美国和国际会计准则的比较价值相关性:德国股票市场的视角
近年来,德国公司根据德国公认会计准则(GAAP)、美国公认会计准则(GAAP)或国际会计准则(IAS)报告合并财务报表。市场观察人士、研究人员和监管机构认为,在股东(或投资者)模式下编制的财务报表,如美国公认会计准则或国际会计准则,比在利益相关者模式下编制的财务报表(德国公认会计准则)提供更好的信息。他们进一步认为,美国公认会计准则的定义更为严格,因此提供的信息优于国际会计准则。我们研究了比较价值相关性,以回报/收益回归的斜率系数来衡量。我们的结果与预期一致。在我们在德国证券交易所交易的德国公司样本中,基于美国公认会计准则的收益的价值相关性高于基于国际会计准则的收益,而国际会计准则又比根据德国公认会计准则产生的收益更具价值相关性。本研究的一个主要贡献是,与先前的研究不同,我们仅衡量德国股票市场中所有样本公司的股票回报,因此不依赖于先前关于不同国家市场定价相似性的研究可能存在的强大假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信