C. Rimando, D. Manlapaz, Lyle Patrick D. Tangcuangco, Samantha Kate C. Africa, Vincent Ronaldo T. Ancheta, Jolo B. Fernando, Camille Louise S. Llave, Jobelle M. Manlapig, Steven Paul O. Paden, Camille A. Ramos, Reggie C. Resurreccion
{"title":"Perspectives of patients on technology-supported community-based rehabilitation: a qualitative study","authors":"C. Rimando, D. Manlapaz, Lyle Patrick D. Tangcuangco, Samantha Kate C. Africa, Vincent Ronaldo T. Ancheta, Jolo B. Fernando, Camille Louise S. Llave, Jobelle M. Manlapig, Steven Paul O. Paden, Camille A. Ramos, Reggie C. Resurreccion","doi":"10.46409/002.ryeq5235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The study's primary aim is to explore the perspectives and experiences of patients regarding technologysupported community-based rehabilitation in the Philippines. The secondary aim is to ascertain the utilization of technologysupported community-based rehabilitation based on the participants' responses. \nMethods: In this qualitative phenomenological study, purposive sampling for recruitment was utilized. Online focus group discussions were conducted with patients who have received rehabilitation in a technology-supported community-based rehabilitation setting. The recorded discussions were transcribed and coded using NVivo 12 software. The study employed an inductive approach of thematic analysis to extract significant themes. Continuous refinement and data analysis were done for data saturation. \nResults: Five themes emerged using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis: accessibility in technology-supported community-based rehabilitation, primary device and platforms used in technologysupported community-based rehabilitation, limitations of technology-supported community-based rehabilitation, perceived usefulness of technology in community-based rehabilitation, and patient satisfaction. \nDiscussion: The facilitators and barriers found in the study affect the participants’ access and perceived usefulness of technology-based community-based rehabilitation which contributes to patient satisfaction. The study also found that patients perceived technology useful in community-based rehabilitation because it facilitates learning of exercises and enhances adherence to home exercise programs.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.ryeq5235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The study's primary aim is to explore the perspectives and experiences of patients regarding technologysupported community-based rehabilitation in the Philippines. The secondary aim is to ascertain the utilization of technologysupported community-based rehabilitation based on the participants' responses.
Methods: In this qualitative phenomenological study, purposive sampling for recruitment was utilized. Online focus group discussions were conducted with patients who have received rehabilitation in a technology-supported community-based rehabilitation setting. The recorded discussions were transcribed and coded using NVivo 12 software. The study employed an inductive approach of thematic analysis to extract significant themes. Continuous refinement and data analysis were done for data saturation.
Results: Five themes emerged using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis: accessibility in technology-supported community-based rehabilitation, primary device and platforms used in technologysupported community-based rehabilitation, limitations of technology-supported community-based rehabilitation, perceived usefulness of technology in community-based rehabilitation, and patient satisfaction.
Discussion: The facilitators and barriers found in the study affect the participants’ access and perceived usefulness of technology-based community-based rehabilitation which contributes to patient satisfaction. The study also found that patients perceived technology useful in community-based rehabilitation because it facilitates learning of exercises and enhances adherence to home exercise programs.