'It's Real': Experiences of Family Homelessness in Fort Worth, Texas

B. Scheffler
{"title":"'It's Real': Experiences of Family Homelessness in Fort Worth, Texas","authors":"B. Scheffler","doi":"10.31237/osf.io/u2n6p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the common public image of homelessness (read: a single “vagrant” person), families with children represent one-third of the homeless population—an especially-serious social problem, since family homelessness has long-term negative impacts on two generations simultaneously. This interdisciplinary study examined the complexities of family homelessness in Fort Worth, Texas. A literature review outlined pathways into family homelessness, shared experiences, and common intervention strategies. An original qualitative study followed, employing a phenomenological approach to interview families in a local rapid-rehousing program. Open-ended question allowed free description of personal realities. Audio-recorded responses were analyzed for relevant themes, commonalities, and variations. Findings suggested that Fort Worth families’ pathways into homelessness are consistent with “life shock theory,” whereby those already financially-strained suddenly experience compounding stresses, leading to homelessness. The study found local and national experiences to be similar; however, it was limited by a convenience sample exclusively comprised of women nearing a housing goal, potentially coloring their outlooks. Finally, the study raised the question whether rapidly-rehoused Fort Worth families are well-positioned for stability. The similarity of participants’ concerns pre- and post-homelessness suggested that some families may transition to a status still “at risk,” rather than “stably-housed.” Considered in the context of previous research, findings supported further interdisciplinary inquiry into how longer-term, post-housing support might promote housing stability.","PeriodicalId":151778,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Women & Gender Issues (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Women & Gender Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/u2n6p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the common public image of homelessness (read: a single “vagrant” person), families with children represent one-third of the homeless population—an especially-serious social problem, since family homelessness has long-term negative impacts on two generations simultaneously. This interdisciplinary study examined the complexities of family homelessness in Fort Worth, Texas. A literature review outlined pathways into family homelessness, shared experiences, and common intervention strategies. An original qualitative study followed, employing a phenomenological approach to interview families in a local rapid-rehousing program. Open-ended question allowed free description of personal realities. Audio-recorded responses were analyzed for relevant themes, commonalities, and variations. Findings suggested that Fort Worth families’ pathways into homelessness are consistent with “life shock theory,” whereby those already financially-strained suddenly experience compounding stresses, leading to homelessness. The study found local and national experiences to be similar; however, it was limited by a convenience sample exclusively comprised of women nearing a housing goal, potentially coloring their outlooks. Finally, the study raised the question whether rapidly-rehoused Fort Worth families are well-positioned for stability. The similarity of participants’ concerns pre- and post-homelessness suggested that some families may transition to a status still “at risk,” rather than “stably-housed.” Considered in the context of previous research, findings supported further interdisciplinary inquiry into how longer-term, post-housing support might promote housing stability.
“这是真的”:德克萨斯州沃斯堡家庭无家可归的经历
尽管无家可归者在公众心目中的形象是一个“流浪汉”,但有孩子的家庭占无家可归人口的三分之一,这是一个特别严重的社会问题,因为家庭无家可归会同时对两代人产生长期的负面影响。这项跨学科研究调查了德克萨斯州沃斯堡家庭无家可归的复杂性。一篇文献综述概述了家庭无家可归的途径、共同的经历和共同的干预策略。随后进行了一项原始的定性研究,采用现象学方法采访了当地快速安置计划中的家庭。开放式问题允许自由描述个人现实。对录音回答进行相关主题、共性和变化分析。研究结果表明,沃斯堡家庭走向无家可归的途径与“生活冲击理论”是一致的,即那些已经经济紧张的家庭突然经历了复合压力,导致无家可归。研究发现,地方和国家的经历是相似的;然而,它受到一个便利样本的限制,该样本仅由接近住房目标的女性组成,这可能会影响她们的前景。最后,该研究提出了一个问题,即迅速重新安置的沃斯堡家庭是否处于稳定的有利地位。参与者在无家可归前和无家可归后的担忧的相似性表明,一些家庭可能会过渡到仍然“处于危险之中”的状态,而不是“稳定的住所”。在先前研究的背景下,研究结果支持进一步的跨学科调查,即长期的住房后支持如何促进住房稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信