Electrical Capacitance Tomography (ECT) and gamma radiation meter for comparison with and validation and tuning of CFD modeling of multiphase flow

C. Pradeep, R. Yan, S. Vestøl, M. Melaaen, S. Mylvaganam
{"title":"Electrical Capacitance Tomography (ECT) and gamma radiation meter for comparison with and validation and tuning of CFD modeling of multiphase flow","authors":"C. Pradeep, R. Yan, S. Vestøl, M. Melaaen, S. Mylvaganam","doi":"10.1109/IST.2012.6295569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrical Capacitance Tomographic (ECT) approach is increasingly seen as attractive for measurement and control applications in the process industries. Recently, there is an increased interest in using the tomographic details from ECT for comparing with and validating and tuning CFD models of multiphase flow. Collaboration with researchers working in the field of CFD modeling of multiphase flows give valuable information for both groups of researchers in the field of ECT and CFD. By studying the ECT tomograms of multiphase flows under carefully monitored inflow conditions of the different media and by obtaining the capacitance values, C(i,j,t) with i=1...N, j=1,2,...N and i ≠ j obtained from ECT modules with N electrodes, it is shown in this paper how the interface heights in a pipe with stratified flow of oil and air can be fruitfully compared to the values of these obtained from ECT and gamma radiation meter (GRM) for improving CFD modeling. Monitored inflow conditions in the present study are flow rates of air, water and oil into a pipe which can be positioned at varying inclinations to the horizontal, thus emulating the pipelines laid in sub-sea installations. It is found that ECT based tomograms show most of the features seen in the GRM based visualizations with nearly one-to-one correspondence to interface heights obtained from these two methods, albeit some anomalies at the pipe wall. However, there are some interesting features the ECT manages to capture, features which the GRM or the CFD modeling apparently do not show possibly due to parameters not defined in the inputs to the CFD model or much slower response of the GRM. Results presented in this paper, indicate that a combination of ECT and GRM and preferably other sensor modalities with enhanced data fusion and analysis combined with CFD modeling can help to improve the modeling, measurement and control of multiphase flow in the oil and gas industries and in the process industries in general.","PeriodicalId":213330,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IST.2012.6295569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Electrical Capacitance Tomographic (ECT) approach is increasingly seen as attractive for measurement and control applications in the process industries. Recently, there is an increased interest in using the tomographic details from ECT for comparing with and validating and tuning CFD models of multiphase flow. Collaboration with researchers working in the field of CFD modeling of multiphase flows give valuable information for both groups of researchers in the field of ECT and CFD. By studying the ECT tomograms of multiphase flows under carefully monitored inflow conditions of the different media and by obtaining the capacitance values, C(i,j,t) with i=1...N, j=1,2,...N and i ≠ j obtained from ECT modules with N electrodes, it is shown in this paper how the interface heights in a pipe with stratified flow of oil and air can be fruitfully compared to the values of these obtained from ECT and gamma radiation meter (GRM) for improving CFD modeling. Monitored inflow conditions in the present study are flow rates of air, water and oil into a pipe which can be positioned at varying inclinations to the horizontal, thus emulating the pipelines laid in sub-sea installations. It is found that ECT based tomograms show most of the features seen in the GRM based visualizations with nearly one-to-one correspondence to interface heights obtained from these two methods, albeit some anomalies at the pipe wall. However, there are some interesting features the ECT manages to capture, features which the GRM or the CFD modeling apparently do not show possibly due to parameters not defined in the inputs to the CFD model or much slower response of the GRM. Results presented in this paper, indicate that a combination of ECT and GRM and preferably other sensor modalities with enhanced data fusion and analysis combined with CFD modeling can help to improve the modeling, measurement and control of multiphase flow in the oil and gas industries and in the process industries in general.
电容层析成像(ECT)和伽马辐射计对多相流CFD建模的比较、验证和调整
电容层析成像(ECT)方法在过程工业的测量和控制应用中越来越有吸引力。最近,人们对使用ECT的层析成像细节来比较、验证和调整多相流的CFD模型越来越感兴趣。与多相流CFD建模领域的研究人员合作,为ECT和CFD领域的两组研究人员提供了宝贵的信息。通过研究不同介质入流条件下多相流的ECT层析图,得到电容值,当i=1时,C(i,j,t)…N, j = 1, 2,……N和i≠j,本文展示了如何将油和空气分层流动管道中的界面高度与ECT和伽玛辐射计(GRM)获得的界面高度进行有效的比较,以改进CFD建模。本研究监测的流入条件是空气、水和油流入管道的流速,该管道可以放置在与水平倾斜不同的位置,从而模拟海底设施中铺设的管道。研究发现,基于ECT的层析图显示了基于GRM的可视化中的大部分特征,与这两种方法获得的界面高度几乎是一对一的对应关系,尽管在管壁处存在一些异常。然而,ECT设法捕捉到了一些有趣的特征,这些特征是由于CFD模型的输入中没有定义参数或GRM的响应慢得多,而GRM或CFD建模显然没有显示出来。本文的研究结果表明,结合ECT和GRM以及其他传感器模式,增强数据融合和分析,结合CFD建模,可以帮助改善石油和天然气工业以及一般过程工业中多相流的建模、测量和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信