The Judge’s Consideration in Sentencing Illegal Drug Distribution in Case No.105/Pid. Sus/2019/Pn. Slw

Aisy Idzati
{"title":"The Judge’s Consideration in Sentencing Illegal Drug Distribution in Case No.105/Pid. Sus/2019/Pn. Slw","authors":"Aisy Idzati","doi":"10.15294/ijcls.v6i2.33916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rampant circulation of illegal drugs shows that the level of public awareness is still low against the risk of drug use that does not meet the requirements of BPOM. Case Number 105/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Slw is a case about illegal drug trafficking without permission from BPOM. This research was conducted to find out the considerations used by judges in sentencing in Case Number 105/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Slw. This study uses a qualitative approach. The type of research used is sociological juridical. Secondary data is collected through library studies. Primary data is collected through interviews. The results showed that the judge, in his decision, used balance theory, scientific theory and ratio decidendi theory in order to get a fair verdict in handing down the verdict.","PeriodicalId":129722,"journal":{"name":"IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v6i2.33916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rampant circulation of illegal drugs shows that the level of public awareness is still low against the risk of drug use that does not meet the requirements of BPOM. Case Number 105/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Slw is a case about illegal drug trafficking without permission from BPOM. This research was conducted to find out the considerations used by judges in sentencing in Case Number 105/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Slw. This study uses a qualitative approach. The type of research used is sociological juridical. Secondary data is collected through library studies. Primary data is collected through interviews. The results showed that the judge, in his decision, used balance theory, scientific theory and ratio decidendi theory in order to get a fair verdict in handing down the verdict.
105/Pid案法官对非法分销毒品量刑的思考。Sus / 2019 / Pn。Slw
非法药物的猖獗流通表明,公众对使用不符合BPOM要求的药物的风险的认识水平仍然很低。案例编号105/Pid.sus/2019/PN。slow是一起未经BPOM许可非法贩卖毒品的案件。本研究旨在了解第105/Pid.sus/2019/PN.Slw号案件中法官在量刑时所考虑的因素。本研究采用定性方法。所使用的研究类型是社会学和法学。二手资料是通过图书馆研究收集的。主要数据是通过访谈收集的。结果表明,法官在判决书中运用了平衡理论、科学理论和比例决定理论,以求得公正的判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信