The Comparison of Zakat Utilization in Muslim Minority and Majority Country

Irma
{"title":"The Comparison of Zakat Utilization in Muslim Minority and Majority Country","authors":"Irma","doi":"10.58968/isf.v1i1.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the categorization of asnaf and the utilization of zakat funds by zakat institutions in Muslim minority countries and Muslim majority countries. The Muslim minority country which is the subject of the research is Thailand, which is represented by the Sattachon Thailand Foundation, as the oldest zakat institution in Bangkok. Meanwhile, Muslim-majority countries are represented by Indonesia through Dompet Dhuafa, Brunei Darussalam through the Islamic Ulema Council of Brunei Darussalam, and Malaysia through Baitul Mal Malaysia. The method used is the Field Research and Library Research methods which are descriptive qualitative. In collecting data using the method of observation, interviews, and documentation. The results showed: (1) The Sattachon Foundation distributed zakat funds to all categories of asnaf, namely the indigent, the poor, amil, converts, riqab, gharim, fi sabilillah, and ibn sabil. The distribution pattern used is traditional consumptive and creative consumptive. (2) There are differences in interpreting the eight asnaf who are entitled to receive zakat, thus causing differences in the implementation of the distribution of zakat funds. The Sattachon Foundation and the Baitul Mal Majlis of the Malaysian Islamic Religion Association (MAIWP) distributed it to all asnaf. Dompet Dhuafa Indonesia distributes to all asnaf groups except riqab. Meanwhile, the Brunei Darussalam Islamic Religious Council (MUIB) does not distribute to asnaf riqab and fi sabilillah. Meanwhile, the distribution pattern applied at the Sattachon Foundation is lagging behind when compared to Dompet Dhuafa Indonesia, Majlis Ulama Islam Brunei Darussalam, and Baitul Mal Malaysia.","PeriodicalId":399105,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Social Finance","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Social Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58968/isf.v1i1.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to compare the categorization of asnaf and the utilization of zakat funds by zakat institutions in Muslim minority countries and Muslim majority countries. The Muslim minority country which is the subject of the research is Thailand, which is represented by the Sattachon Thailand Foundation, as the oldest zakat institution in Bangkok. Meanwhile, Muslim-majority countries are represented by Indonesia through Dompet Dhuafa, Brunei Darussalam through the Islamic Ulema Council of Brunei Darussalam, and Malaysia through Baitul Mal Malaysia. The method used is the Field Research and Library Research methods which are descriptive qualitative. In collecting data using the method of observation, interviews, and documentation. The results showed: (1) The Sattachon Foundation distributed zakat funds to all categories of asnaf, namely the indigent, the poor, amil, converts, riqab, gharim, fi sabilillah, and ibn sabil. The distribution pattern used is traditional consumptive and creative consumptive. (2) There are differences in interpreting the eight asnaf who are entitled to receive zakat, thus causing differences in the implementation of the distribution of zakat funds. The Sattachon Foundation and the Baitul Mal Majlis of the Malaysian Islamic Religion Association (MAIWP) distributed it to all asnaf. Dompet Dhuafa Indonesia distributes to all asnaf groups except riqab. Meanwhile, the Brunei Darussalam Islamic Religious Council (MUIB) does not distribute to asnaf riqab and fi sabilillah. Meanwhile, the distribution pattern applied at the Sattachon Foundation is lagging behind when compared to Dompet Dhuafa Indonesia, Majlis Ulama Islam Brunei Darussalam, and Baitul Mal Malaysia.
穆斯林少数民族与多数民族国家天课利用的比较
本研究旨在比较穆斯林少数民族国家和穆斯林多数国家的天课机构对asnaf的分类和天课基金的使用情况。作为研究对象的穆斯林少数民族国家是泰国,其代表是曼谷最古老的天课机构——萨塔贡泰国基金会(satton Thailand Foundation)。与此同时,穆斯林占多数的国家由印度尼西亚(通过Dompet Dhuafa)、文莱达鲁萨兰国(通过文莱达鲁萨兰国伊斯兰乌里玛委员会)和马来西亚(通过Baitul Mal Malaysia)代表。所使用的方法是实地调查和图书馆调查的方法,这是描述性质的。使用观察、访谈和记录的方法收集数据。结果表明:(1)萨奇顿基金会将天课资金分配给所有类别的asnaf,即贫困者、穷人、穆斯林、皈依者、riqab、gharim、fi sabilillah和ibn sabil。采用传统消费和创新消费的分布模式。(2)对有权接受天课的八位阿斯纳夫的解释存在差异,从而导致天课资金分配的执行存在差异。沙登基金会和马来西亚伊斯兰教协会(MAIWP)的Baitul Mal Majlis将其分发给所有asnaf。东佩特·华发印度尼西亚分发给除riqab以外的所有asnaf团体。同时,文莱达鲁萨兰国伊斯兰宗教理事会(MUIB)不向asnaf riqab和fi sabilillah分发食物。与此同时,与印度尼西亚东佩特·杜瓦法、文莱达鲁萨兰国伊斯兰教Majlis Ulama Islam和马来西亚Baitul Mal相比,萨奇顿基金会采用的分配模式落后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信