THE INFLUENCE OF CYCLE LEARNING MODEL INTEGRATED BY THINK PAIR SHARE AND STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISSION ON QUALITY OF PROCESSES AND COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES

Amar Atus Sholikah, Nanang Zubaidi
{"title":"THE INFLUENCE OF CYCLE LEARNING MODEL INTEGRATED BY THINK PAIR SHARE AND STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISSION ON QUALITY OF PROCESSES AND COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES","authors":"Amar Atus Sholikah, Nanang Zubaidi","doi":"10.26740/jcer.v4n1.p23-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrocarbons are one of the materials from Chemistry that studies abstract concepts and procedural knowledge such as alkanes, alkenes and alkyas. To study hydrocarbon material, students must master well the concepts related to previous concepts such as the concept of covalent bonding and equalizing reactions. If students do not understand the concepts related to hydrocarbon material, it will be difficult to master the concepts in hydrocarbon material. The learning process at school at this time sometimes also still does not increase student creativity and activity. The application of the Learning Cycle 5E learning model combined with cooperative type TPS (Think Pair Share) and cooperative type STAD can be used as an alternative to developing a more meaningful learning atmosphere in understanding concepts and giving students the opportunity to work together to solve problems. The purpose of this study was to determine: the quality of the learning process using the LC 5E - TPS and LC 5E - STAD models on the topic of hydrocarbons, as well as differences in the cognitive learning outcomes of hydrocarbon students who were taught with these two learning models. This study uses a quasi-experimental design with \"Postest Only Group Design\". The sample of this study was students of class XI IPA1 and class XI IPA2 of SMAN I Parang in the 2019/2020 school year, each consisting of 21 people. Class XI IPA1 as an experimental class taught with LC 5E - TPS model and class XI IPA2 as an experimental class taught with LC 5E - STAD model. Research data in the form of observations of the quality of the learning process, the results of observations of students 'cooperative abilities and students' post test scores. Research data were analyzed using t test. The results showed that the quality of the learning process by using the LC 5E - TPS model and the LC 5E - STAD model were included in both categories. Students' cooperative skills in both learning models are included in both categories. Cognitive learning outcomes of students in learning with the LC 5E - TPS model are higher than in learning with the LC 5E - STAD model.","PeriodicalId":444789,"journal":{"name":"JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v4n1.p23-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrocarbons are one of the materials from Chemistry that studies abstract concepts and procedural knowledge such as alkanes, alkenes and alkyas. To study hydrocarbon material, students must master well the concepts related to previous concepts such as the concept of covalent bonding and equalizing reactions. If students do not understand the concepts related to hydrocarbon material, it will be difficult to master the concepts in hydrocarbon material. The learning process at school at this time sometimes also still does not increase student creativity and activity. The application of the Learning Cycle 5E learning model combined with cooperative type TPS (Think Pair Share) and cooperative type STAD can be used as an alternative to developing a more meaningful learning atmosphere in understanding concepts and giving students the opportunity to work together to solve problems. The purpose of this study was to determine: the quality of the learning process using the LC 5E - TPS and LC 5E - STAD models on the topic of hydrocarbons, as well as differences in the cognitive learning outcomes of hydrocarbon students who were taught with these two learning models. This study uses a quasi-experimental design with "Postest Only Group Design". The sample of this study was students of class XI IPA1 and class XI IPA2 of SMAN I Parang in the 2019/2020 school year, each consisting of 21 people. Class XI IPA1 as an experimental class taught with LC 5E - TPS model and class XI IPA2 as an experimental class taught with LC 5E - STAD model. Research data in the form of observations of the quality of the learning process, the results of observations of students 'cooperative abilities and students' post test scores. Research data were analyzed using t test. The results showed that the quality of the learning process by using the LC 5E - TPS model and the LC 5E - STAD model were included in both categories. Students' cooperative skills in both learning models are included in both categories. Cognitive learning outcomes of students in learning with the LC 5E - TPS model are higher than in learning with the LC 5E - STAD model.
思维对分享与学生团队成绩划分相结合的循环学习模式对过程质量和认知学习结果的影响
碳氢化合物是研究烷烃、烯烃、烷基烃等抽象概念和程序性知识的化学材料之一。学习碳氢化合物材料,学生必须掌握好与前面的概念相关的概念,如共价键的概念和平衡反应的概念。如果学生不了解碳氢材料的相关概念,就很难掌握碳氢材料的概念。这个时候在学校的学习过程有时还不能提高学生的创造力和主动性。学习周期5E学习模式结合合作型TPS (Think Pair Share)和合作型STAD的应用,可以作为一种替代方案,在理解概念的过程中营造更有意义的学习氛围,让学生有机会共同解决问题。本研究的目的是确定LC 5E - TPS和LC 5E - STAD模型在碳氢化合物主题学习过程中的质量,以及使用这两种学习模式的碳氢化合物学生的认知学习结果的差异。本研究采用准实验设计,采用“post - Only Group design”。研究数据以观察学习过程的质量、观察学生合作能力的结果和学生后试成绩的形式进行。研究资料采用t检验分析。结果表明,LC 5E - TPS模型和LC 5E - STAD模型的学习过程质量都包含在这两个类别中。两种学习模式下学生的合作技能都包含在两个类别中。lc5e - TPS模式学习的学生认知学习效果高于LC 5E - STAD模式学习的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信