Semi-quantitative Analysis Techniques for AMC Monitoring

Mei Leng Kwan, C. Muller, S. Tan, R. Thomas
{"title":"Semi-quantitative Analysis Techniques for AMC Monitoring","authors":"Mei Leng Kwan, C. Muller, S. Tan, R. Thomas","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The control of airborne molecular contamination (AMC) continues to grow as a requirement for all advanced semiconductor manufacturing. With more fabs using copper processing and 300 mm wafers and as we move past the 90 nm technology node, the requirements for AMC control are becoming more stringent. Most AMC control specifications call for levels to be at or below 1 part per billion (ppb) for the target contaminants and verifying of achievement and maintenance of these levels can be a very expensive proposition if real-time monitoring is an option being considered. There are a number of real-time monitoring technologies available that can measure at sub-ppb levels, however, they can cost upwards of US$20,000 per monitoring location. Due to the large investments required in terms of equipment, supplies, and personnel, manufacturers are looking for lower-cost AMC monitoring options that can still provide information relevant to the protection of processes and materials. There are a number of \"semi quantitative\" analysis techniques being used for AMC monitoring. By this we refer to those analytical techniques that provide quantitative information on environmental air quality, but do not measure specific contaminants. These techniques can involve passive or real-time monitoring using devices such litmus paper, witness wafers, impingers, multi-sorbent tubes, surface contamination monitors, and reactivity monitors. Semi quantitative AMC monitoring techniques are being used to establish AMC fingerprints or baselines for facilities, as part of an \"early warning\" system to identify and track AMC events, and for benchmarking various control strategies. This paper examines a number of these semi quantitative techniques being used today and discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses with regards to AMC monitoring. A relative cost comparison was offered","PeriodicalId":407645,"journal":{"name":"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The control of airborne molecular contamination (AMC) continues to grow as a requirement for all advanced semiconductor manufacturing. With more fabs using copper processing and 300 mm wafers and as we move past the 90 nm technology node, the requirements for AMC control are becoming more stringent. Most AMC control specifications call for levels to be at or below 1 part per billion (ppb) for the target contaminants and verifying of achievement and maintenance of these levels can be a very expensive proposition if real-time monitoring is an option being considered. There are a number of real-time monitoring technologies available that can measure at sub-ppb levels, however, they can cost upwards of US$20,000 per monitoring location. Due to the large investments required in terms of equipment, supplies, and personnel, manufacturers are looking for lower-cost AMC monitoring options that can still provide information relevant to the protection of processes and materials. There are a number of "semi quantitative" analysis techniques being used for AMC monitoring. By this we refer to those analytical techniques that provide quantitative information on environmental air quality, but do not measure specific contaminants. These techniques can involve passive or real-time monitoring using devices such litmus paper, witness wafers, impingers, multi-sorbent tubes, surface contamination monitors, and reactivity monitors. Semi quantitative AMC monitoring techniques are being used to establish AMC fingerprints or baselines for facilities, as part of an "early warning" system to identify and track AMC events, and for benchmarking various control strategies. This paper examines a number of these semi quantitative techniques being used today and discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses with regards to AMC monitoring. A relative cost comparison was offered
AMC监测的半定量分析技术
控制空气中的分子污染(AMC)作为所有先进半导体制造的要求不断增长。随着越来越多的晶圆厂采用铜工艺和300毫米晶圆,随着我们超越90纳米技术节点,对AMC控制的要求变得越来越严格。大多数AMC控制规范要求目标污染物的水平等于或低于十亿分之一(ppb),如果考虑实时监测,验证达到和维持这些水平可能是一项非常昂贵的提议。有许多可用的实时监测技术可以在亚ppb水平进行测量,但是,每个监测地点的成本可能高达20,000美元。由于在设备、用品和人员方面需要大量投资,制造商正在寻找成本更低的AMC监控选项,这些选项仍然可以提供与工艺和材料保护相关的信息。有许多“半定量”分析技术被用于AMC监测。我们指的是那些提供环境空气质量定量信息,但不测量特定污染物的分析技术。这些技术包括使用石蕊试纸、见证晶圆、冲击器、多吸附管、表面污染监测仪和反应性监测仪等设备进行被动或实时监测。半定量AMC监测技术被用于为设施建立AMC指纹或基线,作为“早期预警”系统的一部分,以识别和跟踪AMC事件,并对各种控制策略进行基准测试。本文研究了目前正在使用的一些半定量技术,并讨论了它们在AMC监测方面的相对优势和劣势。给出了一个相对成本比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信