Comparing crossbar-based nano/CMOS architectures

C. Teodorov
{"title":"Comparing crossbar-based nano/CMOS architectures","authors":"C. Teodorov","doi":"10.1109/DTIS.2010.5487598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last few years, a novel set of nanoscale technologies has emerged as an alternative to traditional CMOS circuits. They bring certain promises such as high-density, reduced manufacturing costs, but they also present some challenges. Trying to compare some of the proposed architectures we realized that it is impossible to objectively evaluate them, problem that hinder our ability to practically develop these architectures. To compare these architectures we extracted the similarities between these fabrics and based on these similarities we tried to match the results presented in the literature. Following this methodology we were unable to objectively compare these emergent architectures. In this paper we present the main reasons why such an evaluation is not practical and we show how a common vocabulary and design methodology can solve this problem.","PeriodicalId":423978,"journal":{"name":"5th International Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5th International Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DTIS.2010.5487598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last few years, a novel set of nanoscale technologies has emerged as an alternative to traditional CMOS circuits. They bring certain promises such as high-density, reduced manufacturing costs, but they also present some challenges. Trying to compare some of the proposed architectures we realized that it is impossible to objectively evaluate them, problem that hinder our ability to practically develop these architectures. To compare these architectures we extracted the similarities between these fabrics and based on these similarities we tried to match the results presented in the literature. Following this methodology we were unable to objectively compare these emergent architectures. In this paper we present the main reasons why such an evaluation is not practical and we show how a common vocabulary and design methodology can solve this problem.
比较基于交叉棒的纳米/CMOS架构
在过去的几年里,一套新的纳米技术已经出现,作为传统CMOS电路的替代品。它们带来了一定的希望,比如高密度、降低制造成本,但它们也带来了一些挑战。在尝试比较一些被提议的体系结构时,我们意识到客观地评估它们是不可能的,这个问题阻碍了我们实际开发这些体系结构的能力。为了比较这些架构,我们提取了这些织物之间的相似之处,并基于这些相似之处,我们试图匹配文献中呈现的结果。按照这种方法,我们无法客观地比较这些紧急架构。在本文中,我们提出了这种评估不实用的主要原因,并展示了如何使用通用词汇表和设计方法来解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信