Animal models for testing anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma.

M J Linssen, O H Wilhelms, H Timmerman
{"title":"Animal models for testing anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma.","authors":"M J Linssen, O H Wilhelms, H Timmerman","doi":"10.1007/BF02015576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the first part of this review the important role played by the bronchial hyperreactivity caused by chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation in asthma is described. Deliberately, more emphasis is placed on the role of pro-inflammatory eosinophils, alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and platelets rather than on mast cells and neutrophils or the numerous mediators. The reason for this is that, on account of the large number of mediators and their multitude of functions and interactions in asthma, antagonism of a specific mediator will probably not be clinically relevant for optimally effective curative treatment of asthma. Inhibition of the infiltration and activation of pro-inflammatory cells is likely to be a more successful approach. In the second part, various animal models of bronchial hyperreactivity, which could be suitable for testing anti-asthmatic drugs, are discussed. Most animal models pay too little attention to chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation as the cause of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma. In various models the bronchial hyperreactivity is provoked by a single mediator and this leads to selection of specific antagonists which are unlikely to be of clinical benefit. Rats appear to have certain advantages over guinea-pigs as experimental animals for bronchial hyperreactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19804,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","volume":"13 6","pages":"225-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the first part of this review the important role played by the bronchial hyperreactivity caused by chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation in asthma is described. Deliberately, more emphasis is placed on the role of pro-inflammatory eosinophils, alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and platelets rather than on mast cells and neutrophils or the numerous mediators. The reason for this is that, on account of the large number of mediators and their multitude of functions and interactions in asthma, antagonism of a specific mediator will probably not be clinically relevant for optimally effective curative treatment of asthma. Inhibition of the infiltration and activation of pro-inflammatory cells is likely to be a more successful approach. In the second part, various animal models of bronchial hyperreactivity, which could be suitable for testing anti-asthmatic drugs, are discussed. Most animal models pay too little attention to chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation as the cause of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma. In various models the bronchial hyperreactivity is provoked by a single mediator and this leads to selection of specific antagonists which are unlikely to be of clinical benefit. Rats appear to have certain advantages over guinea-pigs as experimental animals for bronchial hyperreactivity.

抗炎药物治疗哮喘支气管高反应性的实验动物模型。
本文第一部分综述了慢性支气管肺炎症引起的支气管高反应性在哮喘中的重要作用。有意地,更多地强调促炎嗜酸性粒细胞、肺泡巨噬细胞、淋巴细胞和血小板的作用,而不是肥大细胞和中性粒细胞或众多介质。这样做的原因是,考虑到大量的介质及其在哮喘中的多种功能和相互作用,特定介质的拮抗可能与哮喘的最佳有效治疗在临床上不相关。抑制促炎细胞的浸润和活化可能是一种更成功的方法。第二部分讨论了各种支气管高反应性动物模型,这些模型可用于抗哮喘药物的试验。大多数动物模型很少关注慢性支气管肺炎症作为哮喘支气管高反应性的原因。在各种模型中,支气管高反应性是由单一介质引起的,这导致选择特异性拮抗剂,而这些拮抗剂不太可能具有临床益处。作为支气管高反应性实验动物,大鼠似乎比豚鼠具有一定的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书