Cost of hospital antimicrobial chemotherapy. A method for global cost calculation.

I C Gyssens, C A Lennards, Y A Hekster, J W Van der Meer
{"title":"Cost of hospital antimicrobial chemotherapy. A method for global cost calculation.","authors":"I C Gyssens,&nbsp;C A Lennards,&nbsp;Y A Hekster,&nbsp;J W Van der Meer","doi":"10.1007/BF02015579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We will describe the method of cost-identification analysis, which was performed in a Dutch hospital during a review of antimicrobial drugs usage. In the present Dutch hospital budget system, in-patients' drug costs generate no revenues. Efforts to diminish drug costs result in financial benefit for the institution. To maximize cost containment, efforts are to be directed to all cost components. We chose wholesale purchase prices of antimicrobial drugs and national prices for salaries and hospital costs. Global cost comparison shows the most cost effective system of intravenous administration. Push injection is the most economic way to administer intravenous drugs which do not require dilution or prolonged infusion time. For stable solutions, such as metronidazole, ready-to-infuse bags are the most economic system. A global cost calculation is listed for commonly used antimicrobial drugs for in-patients. A cost comparison is given for vancomycin CP and teicoplanin, two antistaphyloccocal drugs, which are probably equieffective. The result of global cost comparison contributes to the decision to include new drugs into the hospital formulary or to replace older ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":19804,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","volume":"13 6","pages":"248-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02015579","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We will describe the method of cost-identification analysis, which was performed in a Dutch hospital during a review of antimicrobial drugs usage. In the present Dutch hospital budget system, in-patients' drug costs generate no revenues. Efforts to diminish drug costs result in financial benefit for the institution. To maximize cost containment, efforts are to be directed to all cost components. We chose wholesale purchase prices of antimicrobial drugs and national prices for salaries and hospital costs. Global cost comparison shows the most cost effective system of intravenous administration. Push injection is the most economic way to administer intravenous drugs which do not require dilution or prolonged infusion time. For stable solutions, such as metronidazole, ready-to-infuse bags are the most economic system. A global cost calculation is listed for commonly used antimicrobial drugs for in-patients. A cost comparison is given for vancomycin CP and teicoplanin, two antistaphyloccocal drugs, which are probably equieffective. The result of global cost comparison contributes to the decision to include new drugs into the hospital formulary or to replace older ones.

医院抗菌化疗费用。一种全局成本计算方法。
我们将描述成本识别分析的方法,这是在荷兰医院进行的抗菌药物使用的审查。在目前的荷兰医院预算体系中,住院病人的药费没有产生任何收入。降低药品成本的努力为机构带来了经济效益。为了最大限度地控制成本,应努力控制所有成本组成部分。我们选择了抗菌药物的批发采购价格和工资和住院费用的国家价格。全球成本比较显示了最具成本效益的静脉给药系统。推注是最经济的静脉给药方式,不需要稀释或延长输注时间。对于稳定的溶液,如甲硝唑,即用袋是最经济的系统。列出了住院患者常用抗菌药物的全球成本计算。本文比较了万古霉素CP和替柯planin这两种抗葡萄球菌药物的成本,两者的效果可能是相同的。全球成本比较的结果有助于决定将新药纳入医院处方或取代旧药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书