Evaluation of Wheelset Re-profiling Strategies Based on Combination Weighting TOPSIS

Yan-ping Mou, Yu Zhang, Xiaoqin Gao, Jianping Peng, Chun-rong Qiu, Deng-zhi Liu
{"title":"Evaluation of Wheelset Re-profiling Strategies Based on Combination Weighting TOPSIS","authors":"Yan-ping Mou, Yu Zhang, Xiaoqin Gao, Jianping Peng, Chun-rong Qiu, Deng-zhi Liu","doi":"10.1109/FENDT54151.2021.9749686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of the subjective and single problem of the current evaluation methods of train re-profiling strategies, taking the single-wheel re-profiling strategies of CRH380D trains as an example, a new evaluation is proposed and it combines entropy weight, the weight of analytic hierarchy process, and the Preference for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Firstly, establish a multi-objective decision-making model and evaluation indicators based on the principle of wheelset re-profiling strategy. Secondly, use Monte Carlo simulation to simulate the single-wheel repair strategies and the corresponding expected value. Then, the objective weight of entropy is established based on the re-profiling strategies, the subjective weight of the analytic hierarchy process is established based on the importance of the three indicators, and the subjective and objective weights are combined to form a new evaluation method with TOPSIS. Finally, the traditional evaluation method and the combined weight TOPSIS evaluation method are used to evaluate the wheelset re-profiling strategy. The results show that compared with the traditional evaluation method, the average value of the combined weighted TOPSIS evaluation value is increased by 31.6%, the standard deviation is reduced by 30.6%, and its stability and reliability are significantly improved.","PeriodicalId":425658,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Far East NDT New Technology & Application Forum (FENDT)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Far East NDT New Technology & Application Forum (FENDT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FENDT54151.2021.9749686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In view of the subjective and single problem of the current evaluation methods of train re-profiling strategies, taking the single-wheel re-profiling strategies of CRH380D trains as an example, a new evaluation is proposed and it combines entropy weight, the weight of analytic hierarchy process, and the Preference for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Firstly, establish a multi-objective decision-making model and evaluation indicators based on the principle of wheelset re-profiling strategy. Secondly, use Monte Carlo simulation to simulate the single-wheel repair strategies and the corresponding expected value. Then, the objective weight of entropy is established based on the re-profiling strategies, the subjective weight of the analytic hierarchy process is established based on the importance of the three indicators, and the subjective and objective weights are combined to form a new evaluation method with TOPSIS. Finally, the traditional evaluation method and the combined weight TOPSIS evaluation method are used to evaluate the wheelset re-profiling strategy. The results show that compared with the traditional evaluation method, the average value of the combined weighted TOPSIS evaluation value is increased by 31.6%, the standard deviation is reduced by 30.6%, and its stability and reliability are significantly improved.
基于组合加权TOPSIS的轮对重型策略评价
针对当前列车重剖面策略评价方法的主观性和单一性问题,以CRH380D列车单轮重剖面策略为例,提出了一种结合熵权、层次分析法权重和TOPSIS (Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution)的评价方法。首先,基于轮对重剖面策略原理,建立了多目标决策模型和评价指标;其次,利用蒙特卡罗仿真对单轮维修策略和相应的期望值进行了仿真。然后,基于重新剖析策略建立熵的客观权重,基于三个指标的重要度建立层次分析法的主观权重,并将主客观权重与TOPSIS相结合,形成新的评价方法。最后,采用传统评价方法和组合权重TOPSIS评价方法对轮对重形策略进行了评价。结果表明,与传统评价方法相比,组合加权TOPSIS评价值的平均值提高了31.6%,标准差降低了30.6%,其稳定性和可靠性显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信