{"title":"Investigating how people deal with silence in a human-robot conversation","authors":"Kiyona Oto, Jianmei Feng, M. Imai","doi":"10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we focus on “silence,” which appears as a gap or delay in giving a response during a conversation and is one of the most important factors to consider to have a more natural conversation with robots. In the conversation between a human and a robot, silence can be divided into two parts: first, a silence that a human uses for a robot and second, a silence that a robot takes for a human. Therefore, we conducted a conversation test between a human and a robot in order to clarify the following two points: one, whether humans use silence for a robot and two, how silence used by a robot can be interpreted by humans. The results of the experiment indicate that humans certainly use silence for a robot for some reasons. Participants were asked to label the silences in four different types: Semantic Silence, Syntactical and Grammatical Silence, Interactive Silence, and Robotic Silence. As a result of this classification, there were cases where humans used Interactive Silence to be concerned for a robot, similar to that in case of a human conversation partner. It is now clear that humans use and regard silence in a form closer to a human conversation partner rather than a machine partner while in conversation with a communication robot. In particular, we found that sometimes humans use silence in social sense such as Interactive Silence, which is for the consciousness of a conversation partner.","PeriodicalId":134777,"journal":{"name":"2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
In this paper, we focus on “silence,” which appears as a gap or delay in giving a response during a conversation and is one of the most important factors to consider to have a more natural conversation with robots. In the conversation between a human and a robot, silence can be divided into two parts: first, a silence that a human uses for a robot and second, a silence that a robot takes for a human. Therefore, we conducted a conversation test between a human and a robot in order to clarify the following two points: one, whether humans use silence for a robot and two, how silence used by a robot can be interpreted by humans. The results of the experiment indicate that humans certainly use silence for a robot for some reasons. Participants were asked to label the silences in four different types: Semantic Silence, Syntactical and Grammatical Silence, Interactive Silence, and Robotic Silence. As a result of this classification, there were cases where humans used Interactive Silence to be concerned for a robot, similar to that in case of a human conversation partner. It is now clear that humans use and regard silence in a form closer to a human conversation partner rather than a machine partner while in conversation with a communication robot. In particular, we found that sometimes humans use silence in social sense such as Interactive Silence, which is for the consciousness of a conversation partner.