THE CONCEPT OF SEARCH AND ITS PLACE IN THE SYSTEM OF OTHER INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS

B. Muradov, Vokhidzhon Khomidov
{"title":"THE CONCEPT OF SEARCH AND ITS PLACE IN THE SYSTEM OF OTHER INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS","authors":"B. Muradov, Vokhidzhon Khomidov","doi":"10.51788/tsul.rols.2023.7.1./kxln2391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the concept of investigative action and search process, the essence of operational and investigative action, the opinions of scientists who conducted research on this subject, ensuring the priority of criminal procedural norms at the stage of referral to court, the criteria by which investigative actions can be distinguished from criminal procedural actions, the place of search and investigative action in the system of other investigative actions. The definition of the search and investigative action is not expressed in the legal documents, and there are some inaccuracies in the correct understanding of the content of this investigative action in investigative practice and its correct application, such incidents occur in cases where in judicial and investigative practice the search should be performed. Differences in the conduct of such investigative actions as inspection, seizure, examination of evidence at the scene of the incident, or testimony are specified in the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Operative-Investigative Activity”: “Inspection of residential and other places, buildings, structures, land, technical and vehicles” and “Detained persons, their belongings and documents, as well as their vehicles may be inspected in the manner prescribed by law”. Investigative actions, common and different from the procedure provided by Chapter XXI of the Code of Administrative Responsibility, which defines administrative detention, inspection of things and vehicles, confiscation of things and documents, are justified.","PeriodicalId":102464,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.rols.2023.7.1./kxln2391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the concept of investigative action and search process, the essence of operational and investigative action, the opinions of scientists who conducted research on this subject, ensuring the priority of criminal procedural norms at the stage of referral to court, the criteria by which investigative actions can be distinguished from criminal procedural actions, the place of search and investigative action in the system of other investigative actions. The definition of the search and investigative action is not expressed in the legal documents, and there are some inaccuracies in the correct understanding of the content of this investigative action in investigative practice and its correct application, such incidents occur in cases where in judicial and investigative practice the search should be performed. Differences in the conduct of such investigative actions as inspection, seizure, examination of evidence at the scene of the incident, or testimony are specified in the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Operative-Investigative Activity”: “Inspection of residential and other places, buildings, structures, land, technical and vehicles” and “Detained persons, their belongings and documents, as well as their vehicles may be inspected in the manner prescribed by law”. Investigative actions, common and different from the procedure provided by Chapter XXI of the Code of Administrative Responsibility, which defines administrative detention, inspection of things and vehicles, confiscation of things and documents, are justified.
搜查的概念及其在其他侦查行为体系中的地位
本文从侦查行动和搜查程序的概念、侦查行动和侦查行动的本质、从事这一课题研究的科学家的意见、确保刑事程序规范在移交法院阶段的优先地位、侦查行动区别于刑事程序行动的标准、侦查行动在其他侦查行动体系中的地位等方面进行了探讨。法律文书中没有明确规定搜查和侦查行为的定义,在侦查实践中对搜查和侦查行为的内容的正确理解和正确适用上存在一些不准确的地方,此类事件发生在司法和侦查实践中应当实施搜查的案件中。在检查、扣押、在事件现场检查证据或证词等调查行动的不同之处载于乌兹别克斯坦共和国“行动-调查活动”法中:“检查住宅和其他地点、建筑物、结构、土地、技术和车辆”和“可按法律规定的方式检查被拘留者、其财物和文件以及其车辆”。《行政责任法典》第21章规定了行政拘留、检查物品和车辆、没收物品和文件的规定,而调查行动同该章规定的程序一样或不同,都是正当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信