Comparison of Common Artifact Rejection Methods applied to Direct Cortical and Peripheral Stimulation in Human ECoG

K. Sellers, William L. Schuerman, Heather E. Dawes, E. Chang, Matthew K. Leonard
{"title":"Comparison of Common Artifact Rejection Methods applied to Direct Cortical and Peripheral Stimulation in Human ECoG","authors":"K. Sellers, William L. Schuerman, Heather E. Dawes, E. Chang, Matthew K. Leonard","doi":"10.1109/NER.2019.8716980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Invasive and non-invasive electrical stimulation are increasingly being used for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders, and for characterizing neural circuits involved in a range of behaviors. However, there are substantial challenges in understanding the effects of stimulation on brain activity due to contamination of electrophysiological recordings by electrical stimulation artifacts. Here, we compare the performance of several artifact removal methods on electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings with simultaneous cortical or peripheral stimulation in humans. We systematically evaluated the effects of stimulation modality, stimulation frequency, and neural recording frequency on the ability to reconstruct neural activity amplitude and phase data. We found that no single method was most effective for all situations, however it was possible to reconstruct key neural data features in every case. The development of optimized artifact removal procedures will facilitate clearer understanding of the biological effects of electrical stimulation and allow for improved therapeutic applications.","PeriodicalId":356177,"journal":{"name":"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2019.8716980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Invasive and non-invasive electrical stimulation are increasingly being used for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders, and for characterizing neural circuits involved in a range of behaviors. However, there are substantial challenges in understanding the effects of stimulation on brain activity due to contamination of electrophysiological recordings by electrical stimulation artifacts. Here, we compare the performance of several artifact removal methods on electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings with simultaneous cortical or peripheral stimulation in humans. We systematically evaluated the effects of stimulation modality, stimulation frequency, and neural recording frequency on the ability to reconstruct neural activity amplitude and phase data. We found that no single method was most effective for all situations, however it was possible to reconstruct key neural data features in every case. The development of optimized artifact removal procedures will facilitate clearer understanding of the biological effects of electrical stimulation and allow for improved therapeutic applications.
常用伪影抑制方法在人类脑电图直接皮层和外周刺激中的应用比较
侵入性和非侵入性电刺激越来越多地用于神经系统疾病的诊断和治疗,以及表征涉及一系列行为的神经回路。然而,由于电刺激伪影污染了电生理记录,因此在理解刺激对大脑活动的影响方面存在重大挑战。在这里,我们比较了几种伪影去除方法在皮质电图(ECoG)记录上的性能,同时刺激人类皮层或外周。我们系统地评估了刺激方式、刺激频率和神经记录频率对重建神经活动振幅和相位数据的能力的影响。我们发现没有一种方法对所有情况都是最有效的,但是在每种情况下都有可能重建关键的神经数据特征。优化伪影去除程序的发展将有助于更清楚地了解电刺激的生物效应,并允许改进治疗应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信