Histria – Acropolă Centru-Sud. Date asupra artefactelor din materii dure animale (II) / Histria – Acropolis Centre-South. Data on bone and antler artefacts (II)

Corneliu Beldiman, Valentin Bottez, A. Bivolaru, Diana-Maria Beldiman
{"title":"Histria – Acropolă Centru-Sud. Date asupra artefactelor din materii dure animale (II) / Histria – Acropolis Centre-South. Data on bone and antler artefacts (II)","authors":"Corneliu Beldiman, Valentin Bottez, A. Bivolaru, Diana-Maria Beldiman","doi":"10.3406/mcarh.2019.2097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the artefacts from osseous raw materials discoveret in Histria – Acropolis Centre‐ South Sector is integrated in the series of extensive scientific valorisation of the artefacts from osseous raw materials recovered from archaeological sites located in Dobrudja – see the bibliography. Consequently, the common and significant presence of this kind of artefacts is documented in terms of quantities, types and data obtained from the inventory of the archaeological structures dated to the Roman and Roman‐ Byzantine periods in Histria – Acropolis Centre‐ South Sector. Their systematic recovery and study will continue to be a goal for the research team of this sector as part of the broader scientific objectives of the on‐ going project. The article offers the extensive primary research data of the assemblage obtained following the 2013– 2016 archaeological campaigns, comprising 31 pieces. The typological categories are quite various : tools, adornments, accessories, hafts, raw materials and debris. The local procurement of osseous raw materials (bone, deer antler, wild boar tusks) is taken into account. The artefacts have been made probably within mixt workshops (metal, wood, bone etc.), where various tools, accessories from different raw materials etc. have been produced. The technical solutions of manufacture have been defined using microscopic analysis. Artefacts are dated in the Roman and Roman‐ Byzantine periods (2nd– 6th century AD). Further chronological data cannot be formulated due to the disturbed context of last dwelling levels and standardised parameters of the artefacts. The piece HIS‐ ACS_ 15 (dated to the 6th century AD, Fig. 16) is a remarkable exception due to its ornamentation, which attests the use of dye that was exceptionally well preserved. Given the fact that the decoration of the bone item still preserves traces of black pigment, the team decided to conduct a compositional non‐ destructive analysis using a portable X‐ Ray Fluorescence spectrometer Innov‐ X Systems Alpha Series, with W anticathode tube, SiPIN diode, Peltier cooling effect. The analysis on Analytical mode was conducted on both the interior side (less finished, undecorated) and the exterior side (finely worked, decorated) in order to determine possible differences in the composition (Tables 6– 7, Graph 5). The analysis conducted on the upper (decorated) side indicates again the presence of iron and lead, but this time the latter in a very high amount (70.51% Pb). The presence of both lead and iron on the surface of the decorated object could be possibly explained in terms of the original use of two pigments of different origin, one based on iron (an iron oxide – ochre ?) and another on lead. These would have been either mixed to obtain a final desired colour or combined to obtain two different hues or nuances on the surface (for example, ground in one hue of red and the concentric circles in another). Another possible explanation is that the surface of the object was coloured in black using only a lead oxide, while the presence of iron indicates the prolonged contact of the bone object with an iron object. The fact that the amount of iron is much higher on the interior of the object, in combination with the presence of zinc and a small amount of lead, could serve as an argument in favour of the original use of the red deer item as a convex plaque for an iron object. Artefacts made of osseous raw materials which were studied on this occasion offer important typological and technological benchmarks for complex and extensive approach of civilisation and culture of the Histrian communities during Roman and Roman‐ Byzantine epoch.","PeriodicalId":285703,"journal":{"name":"Materiale şi cercetãri arheologice (Serie nouã)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materiale şi cercetãri arheologice (Serie nouã)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/mcarh.2019.2097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The analysis of the artefacts from osseous raw materials discoveret in Histria – Acropolis Centre‐ South Sector is integrated in the series of extensive scientific valorisation of the artefacts from osseous raw materials recovered from archaeological sites located in Dobrudja – see the bibliography. Consequently, the common and significant presence of this kind of artefacts is documented in terms of quantities, types and data obtained from the inventory of the archaeological structures dated to the Roman and Roman‐ Byzantine periods in Histria – Acropolis Centre‐ South Sector. Their systematic recovery and study will continue to be a goal for the research team of this sector as part of the broader scientific objectives of the on‐ going project. The article offers the extensive primary research data of the assemblage obtained following the 2013– 2016 archaeological campaigns, comprising 31 pieces. The typological categories are quite various : tools, adornments, accessories, hafts, raw materials and debris. The local procurement of osseous raw materials (bone, deer antler, wild boar tusks) is taken into account. The artefacts have been made probably within mixt workshops (metal, wood, bone etc.), where various tools, accessories from different raw materials etc. have been produced. The technical solutions of manufacture have been defined using microscopic analysis. Artefacts are dated in the Roman and Roman‐ Byzantine periods (2nd– 6th century AD). Further chronological data cannot be formulated due to the disturbed context of last dwelling levels and standardised parameters of the artefacts. The piece HIS‐ ACS_ 15 (dated to the 6th century AD, Fig. 16) is a remarkable exception due to its ornamentation, which attests the use of dye that was exceptionally well preserved. Given the fact that the decoration of the bone item still preserves traces of black pigment, the team decided to conduct a compositional non‐ destructive analysis using a portable X‐ Ray Fluorescence spectrometer Innov‐ X Systems Alpha Series, with W anticathode tube, SiPIN diode, Peltier cooling effect. The analysis on Analytical mode was conducted on both the interior side (less finished, undecorated) and the exterior side (finely worked, decorated) in order to determine possible differences in the composition (Tables 6– 7, Graph 5). The analysis conducted on the upper (decorated) side indicates again the presence of iron and lead, but this time the latter in a very high amount (70.51% Pb). The presence of both lead and iron on the surface of the decorated object could be possibly explained in terms of the original use of two pigments of different origin, one based on iron (an iron oxide – ochre ?) and another on lead. These would have been either mixed to obtain a final desired colour or combined to obtain two different hues or nuances on the surface (for example, ground in one hue of red and the concentric circles in another). Another possible explanation is that the surface of the object was coloured in black using only a lead oxide, while the presence of iron indicates the prolonged contact of the bone object with an iron object. The fact that the amount of iron is much higher on the interior of the object, in combination with the presence of zinc and a small amount of lead, could serve as an argument in favour of the original use of the red deer item as a convex plaque for an iron object. Artefacts made of osseous raw materials which were studied on this occasion offer important typological and technological benchmarks for complex and extensive approach of civilisation and culture of the Histrian communities during Roman and Roman‐ Byzantine epoch.
从史迪亚-卫城中心-南区发现的骨骼原料中发现的人工制品的分析被整合在一系列广泛的科学评估中,这些人工制品是从位于Dobrudja的考古遗址中回收的骨骼原料中获得的-见参考书目。因此,这类文物的普遍和重要的存在是根据数量、类型和从历史-卫城中心-南区罗马和罗马-拜占庭时期的考古结构清单中获得的数据来记录的。它们的系统恢复和研究将继续成为该部门研究团队的目标,作为正在进行的项目更广泛的科学目标的一部分。本文提供了2013 - 2016年考古活动后获得的广泛的原始研究数据,包括31件作品。类型学分类相当多样:工具、装饰品、配件、轴、原材料和碎片。考虑到当地骨骼原料(骨头、鹿角、野猪牙)的采购。这些文物可能是在混合车间(金属,木材,骨头等)中制作的,在那里生产了各种工具,来自不同原材料的配件等。利用显微分析确定了制造的技术方案。这些文物的年代可以追溯到罗马和罗马-拜占庭时期(公元2 - 6世纪)。由于最后的居住水平和人工制品的标准化参数受到干扰,进一步的时间顺序数据无法制定。HIS‐ACS_ 15(可追溯到公元6世纪,图16)是一个显著的例外,因为它的装饰,这证明了使用的染料保存得非常好。考虑到骨头的装饰仍然保留了黑色颜料的痕迹,研究小组决定使用便携式X射线荧光光谱仪Innov - X Systems Alpha系列进行成分非破坏性分析,该光谱仪带有W反阴极管,SiPIN二极管,Peltier冷却效果。分析模式的分析在内部(未加工,未装饰)和外部(精细加工,装饰)进行,以确定成分可能的差异(表6 - 7,图5)。在上部(装饰)进行的分析再次表明铁和铅的存在,但这一次后者的含量非常高(70.51%的铅)。装饰物表面上铅和铁的存在可能是由于最初使用了两种不同来源的颜料,一种是基于铁(氧化铁-赭石?),另一种是基于铅。这些可能已经混合,以获得最终所需的颜色或组合,以获得两种不同的色调或表面上的细微差别(例如,地面在一个色调的红色和同心圆在另一个)。另一种可能的解释是,该物体的表面是用氧化铅涂成黑色的,而铁的存在表明,骨骼物体与铁物体长时间接触。事实上,物体内部的铁含量要高得多,再加上锌和少量铅的存在,可以作为支持最初将马鹿物品用作铁物体凸斑的论据。在此场合研究的由骨骼原料制成的人工制品为罗马和罗马-拜占庭时代历史社区复杂而广泛的文明和文化方法提供了重要的类型学和技术基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信