Subject grammar forms in the semantic-syntactic structure of a sentence

S. Riznyk
{"title":"Subject grammar forms in the semantic-syntactic structure of a sentence","authors":"S. Riznyk","doi":"10.17721/um/52(2022).44-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of case forms that implement the subjective meaning in the semantic structure of a simple sentence. The attention is paid to the noun forms of the nominative, vocative, genitive, dative, accusative and instrumental cases of an agent in the Ukrainian sentence. The grammar functions of an agent in different cases are considered, i.e. of a subject in the nominative and vocative cases, of an object in the genitive, dative, accusative and instrumental cases. Background. The analysis of the sentence semantics involves the study of the interaction between its semantic and formal layout. The interrelation between sentence semantic and syntactic structures reveals formal models of predicative grammar constructions. Purpose. The analysed models with subject syntaxemes denoting an agent, an experiencer, an actor, quantity, quality, and a location enable linguists and language learners to determine the grammatical means of expressing substantive (subject) semantics. Methods. In the study of grammatical forms of subject syntaxemes, the structural method is used, in particular, the methods of sentence model transformation and component analysis. In a number of cases, these techniques helped to reveal that a substantive syntaxeme with subject semantics, expressed in the indirect (genitive, dative, accusative, instrumental) case, is regularly transformed into a subject syntaxeme in the nominative case in the grammatical position of the subject. Results. The grammar models considered in the article demonstrate that the semantic subject of the Ukrainian sentence can be expressed by all case forms without preposition. The variety of forms and means of subject expression allows the noun and its equivalents to realize their agent function in a semantic-syntactic combination with predicates of both verbal and its derivative forms (noun, numeral, adjective, adverbial) nature. Conclusion. The main grammar form of expressing subjectivity is the nominative case combined with a predicate of action, state, process, quantitative, qualitative or locative feature. The vocative case regularly denotes the subject of addressed speech, the other morphological forms of subjects (genitive, dative, accusative, instrumental) have a much narrower application in the Ukrainian sentence.","PeriodicalId":159224,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/um/52(2022).44-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of case forms that implement the subjective meaning in the semantic structure of a simple sentence. The attention is paid to the noun forms of the nominative, vocative, genitive, dative, accusative and instrumental cases of an agent in the Ukrainian sentence. The grammar functions of an agent in different cases are considered, i.e. of a subject in the nominative and vocative cases, of an object in the genitive, dative, accusative and instrumental cases. Background. The analysis of the sentence semantics involves the study of the interaction between its semantic and formal layout. The interrelation between sentence semantic and syntactic structures reveals formal models of predicative grammar constructions. Purpose. The analysed models with subject syntaxemes denoting an agent, an experiencer, an actor, quantity, quality, and a location enable linguists and language learners to determine the grammatical means of expressing substantive (subject) semantics. Methods. In the study of grammatical forms of subject syntaxemes, the structural method is used, in particular, the methods of sentence model transformation and component analysis. In a number of cases, these techniques helped to reveal that a substantive syntaxeme with subject semantics, expressed in the indirect (genitive, dative, accusative, instrumental) case, is regularly transformed into a subject syntaxeme in the nominative case in the grammatical position of the subject. Results. The grammar models considered in the article demonstrate that the semantic subject of the Ukrainian sentence can be expressed by all case forms without preposition. The variety of forms and means of subject expression allows the noun and its equivalents to realize their agent function in a semantic-syntactic combination with predicates of both verbal and its derivative forms (noun, numeral, adjective, adverbial) nature. Conclusion. The main grammar form of expressing subjectivity is the nominative case combined with a predicate of action, state, process, quantitative, qualitative or locative feature. The vocative case regularly denotes the subject of addressed speech, the other morphological forms of subjects (genitive, dative, accusative, instrumental) have a much narrower application in the Ukrainian sentence.
主语语法在句子的语义句法结构中形成
本文分析了在简单句的语义结构中体现主观意义的格形式。重点研究了乌克兰语句中代理人的主格、呼格、格、格、宾格和工具格的名词形式。主体在不同情况下的语法功能,即主语在主格和呼格情况下的语法功能,宾语在物主、格、宾格和工具情况下的语法功能。背景。句子语义分析涉及到对句子语义与形式布局之间相互作用的研究。句子语义结构和句法结构之间的相互关系揭示了谓语语法结构的形式模型。目的。所分析的模型具有表示主体、体验者、行为者、数量、质量和位置的主语句法,使语言学家和语言学习者能够确定表达实体(主语)语义的语法手段。方法。在主语句法的语法形式研究中,主要采用结构方法,特别是句型模型转换和成分分析方法。在许多情况下,这些技术有助于揭示具有主语语义的实体句法位,在间接(所有格、与格、宾格、工具)情况下表达,在主语的语法位置上,在主格情况下有规律地转化为主语句法位。结果。本文所考虑的语法模型表明,乌克兰语句子的语义主语可以用不加介词的所有格形式来表达。主语表达形式和方式的多样性,使名词及其等价物能够与动词及其派生形式(名词、数词、形容词、副词)的谓语在语义句法上相结合,实现其主体功能。结论。表达主体性的主要语法形式是主格与动作、状态、过程、数量、质量或位置特征的谓语相结合。呼格通常表示被称呼话语的主语,主语的其他形态形式(物主、格、宾格、工具格)在乌克兰语句子中的应用要窄得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书