Are Emissions Trading Schemes a Pathway to Enhancing Transparency under the Paris Agreement?

Ling Chen
{"title":"Are Emissions Trading Schemes a Pathway to Enhancing Transparency under the Paris Agreement?","authors":"Ling Chen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3049064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Paris Agreement (PA) provides the foundation and future for global carbon markets that country Parties can embrace to realize their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in a transparent manner. The agreement references transparency throughout its text with article 13 specifically establishing an enhanced and flexible transparency framework. This framework requires all Parties to regularly submit a national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory, provide information on progress in implementing and achieving their NDCs, as well as subject themselves to both expert and peer-to-peer review. Cooperative approaches in article 6.2 also offer a good opportunity for internationally transferred mitigation outcomes to be used by Parties to achieve their NDCs in a manner that ensures environmental integrity and enhances transparency.<br> <br>More discussions have focused on carbon markets as a pathway to reducing GHG emissions while generating economic, political, and strategic benefits. This Article further frames the argument that market-based approaches such as emissions trading schemes (ETSs) can also advance the transparency objectives of the PA. Insights are offered into how developing ETSs can promote transparency in tracking GHG emissions. I analyze some features of ETSs, especially their capacity building processes that can benefit the PA’s transparency framework. I also explore how linking transboundary ETSs can improve climate data reporting and facilitate information sharing on global climate action and progress.","PeriodicalId":237010,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Carbon Trading (Politics) (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Carbon Trading (Politics) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3049064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Paris Agreement (PA) provides the foundation and future for global carbon markets that country Parties can embrace to realize their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in a transparent manner. The agreement references transparency throughout its text with article 13 specifically establishing an enhanced and flexible transparency framework. This framework requires all Parties to regularly submit a national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory, provide information on progress in implementing and achieving their NDCs, as well as subject themselves to both expert and peer-to-peer review. Cooperative approaches in article 6.2 also offer a good opportunity for internationally transferred mitigation outcomes to be used by Parties to achieve their NDCs in a manner that ensures environmental integrity and enhances transparency.

More discussions have focused on carbon markets as a pathway to reducing GHG emissions while generating economic, political, and strategic benefits. This Article further frames the argument that market-based approaches such as emissions trading schemes (ETSs) can also advance the transparency objectives of the PA. Insights are offered into how developing ETSs can promote transparency in tracking GHG emissions. I analyze some features of ETSs, especially their capacity building processes that can benefit the PA’s transparency framework. I also explore how linking transboundary ETSs can improve climate data reporting and facilitate information sharing on global climate action and progress.
排放交易计划是提高《巴黎协定》透明度的途径吗?
《巴黎协定》为全球碳市场提供了基础和未来,缔约方可以以透明的方式实现其国家自主贡献(NDCs)。该协定在其整个案文中提到透明度,第13条具体建立了一个加强和灵活的透明度框架。该框架要求所有缔约方定期提交国家温室气体(GHG)清单,提供关于实施和实现国家自主贡献进展的信息,并接受专家和同行评审。第6.2条中的合作办法也为缔约方利用国际转让的缓解成果以确保环境完整性和提高透明度的方式实现其国家自主贡献提供了一个很好的机会。更多的讨论集中在将碳市场作为减少温室气体排放,同时产生经济、政治和战略效益的途径上。本文进一步阐述了以市场为基础的方法,如排放交易计划(ets)也可以促进《巴黎协定》的透明度目标。对发展碳排放交易体系如何促进跟踪温室气体排放的透明度提出了见解。我分析了碳排放交易体系的一些特点,特别是它们的能力建设过程,这些过程可以使PA的透明度框架受益。我还探讨了跨界碳排放交易体系的联系如何改善气候数据报告,促进全球气候行动和进展的信息共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信