Is Learning Medical Terminology Facilitated with Visual Materials?

Fatmanur Uysal
{"title":"Is Learning Medical Terminology Facilitated with Visual Materials?","authors":"Fatmanur Uysal","doi":"10.29228/JAMP.50146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The aim of this study was to observe the effects of visual materials with technology in anatomical terminology learning and short-and memorize. A total of 187 students enrolled and divided into two groups, 95 students (17.89± 0.06 years, 63 F, 32 M) were in group A and 92 students (17.94±0.05 years, 67 F, 25 M) were in group B. Group A received a document containing anatomic terms supported with visually (ex. pictures, shapes, cartoons) and Turkish meanings of terms, which uploaded to the phones of students. A text that contains anatomic terms and Turkish meanings of terms was given to students in Group B. Students studied these documents in their spare time. During semester three routine quizzes were conducted to the students. First exam was performed one week after documents were given, second exam was 1 month, and third exam was three months after. The content of all exams was the same. All exams were held without prior notice to assess learning skills and self-study request. There was a significant difference between three exams (p<0.001). Examination scores was significantly higher in second and third exam comparing with first exam. Also second exam score was significantly higher than third exam (p<0.001). There was a significant difference in examination scores between and within groups (p<0.001). Examination scores was significantly higher in group A than group B at three exams. The study shows that more visual education with technology can be a useful tool if well designed and integrated into current anatomy teaching methods and the curriculum.","PeriodicalId":210978,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Academic Medicine and Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Academic Medicine and Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29228/JAMP.50146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The aim of this study was to observe the effects of visual materials with technology in anatomical terminology learning and short-and memorize. A total of 187 students enrolled and divided into two groups, 95 students (17.89± 0.06 years, 63 F, 32 M) were in group A and 92 students (17.94±0.05 years, 67 F, 25 M) were in group B. Group A received a document containing anatomic terms supported with visually (ex. pictures, shapes, cartoons) and Turkish meanings of terms, which uploaded to the phones of students. A text that contains anatomic terms and Turkish meanings of terms was given to students in Group B. Students studied these documents in their spare time. During semester three routine quizzes were conducted to the students. First exam was performed one week after documents were given, second exam was 1 month, and third exam was three months after. The content of all exams was the same. All exams were held without prior notice to assess learning skills and self-study request. There was a significant difference between three exams (p<0.001). Examination scores was significantly higher in second and third exam comparing with first exam. Also second exam score was significantly higher than third exam (p<0.001). There was a significant difference in examination scores between and within groups (p<0.001). Examination scores was significantly higher in group A than group B at three exams. The study shows that more visual education with technology can be a useful tool if well designed and integrated into current anatomy teaching methods and the curriculum.
视觉材料有助于医学术语的学习吗?
目的:观察视觉材料与技术在解剖学术语学习和速记记忆中的作用。187名学生被分为两组,A组95名学生(17.89±0.06岁,63岁,32岁),b组92名学生(17.94±0.05岁,67岁,25岁)。A组收到一份包含解剖学术语的文档,并以视觉(如图片、形状、漫画)和术语的土耳其语含义为支持,上传至学生的手机。给b组学生一份包含解剖学术语和术语的土耳其语含义的文本。学生们在业余时间学习这些文件。在学期中,对学生进行了三次例行测验。第一次检查于给予资料一周后进行,第二次检查于1个月后进行,第三次检查于3个月后进行。所有考试的内容都是一样的。所有考试在没有事先通知的情况下举行,以评估学习技能和自学要求。三种检查之间有显著差异(p<0.001)。第二次和第三次考试成绩明显高于第一次考试成绩。第二次考试成绩显著高于第三次考试(p<0.001)。组间及组内考试成绩差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。A组三次考试成绩均显著高于B组。该研究表明,如果设计得当,并将其与当前的解剖学教学方法和课程相结合,更多的视觉教育技术可以成为一种有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书