PSYCHOLOGICAL-PEDAGOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL-EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE OF THE ISSUES OF TRAINING MASTERS OF HUMANITIES ON AXIOLOGICAL BASIS

R. Vynnychuk
{"title":"PSYCHOLOGICAL-PEDAGOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL-EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE OF THE ISSUES OF TRAINING MASTERS OF HUMANITIES ON AXIOLOGICAL BASIS","authors":"R. Vynnychuk","doi":"10.33989/2519-8254.2022.11.275543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, based on the analysis of modern aspects of the modernization of the world and national educational systems, the question of the formation of professional values and attitudes of specialists in the humanitarian field (philosophers, historians, religious scholars, philologists, culturologists) as carriers of general culture and creators of humanistic practices of the interaction of various social and ethnic groups on axiological grounds is updated. \nThe paper aims to systematically analyze samples of psychological-pedagogical and philosophical-educational discourse, which reflect modern axiological ideas, the history of the development of educational values, and proposed means of implementing these assets in the national system of training specialists in the humanitarian field. \nLeading psychological-pedagogical models of discourse include freedom of thought as a variant of the individual’s freedom to choose a system of values (P. Shchedrovytskyi), the three-component approach to personality (G. Lasuel, Z. Freud); identification of value paradigms of education (O. Sukhomlynska, N. Tkachova); the concept of education as a socio-cultural phenomenon (V. Ohneviuk); the need for corrections in the management of education as a social institution (V. Kryzhko) and others. \nThe assets of the philosophical and educational discourse of the research issue were chosen: S. Klepko’s identification of the leading regulatory values of education – love, and agreement with the values of being; interpretation of I. Utyuzh’s self-worth of education in line with the philosophical and anthropological tradition, the vision of the personality of a specialist as the dominant value of Ukrainian professional education; the scientific position of scientists regarding the fact that no value system can be implemented without the creative innovations of an individual since the development of professional culture is impossible without the cultivation of the individual's creative potential (A. Arkhiezer, M. Sheler, I. Ziaziun). \nIt was found that the main perspective of the research is the search for ways to resolve the contradictions between the social demand for a creative, active, harmonious value system of a professional personality and the lack of value-oriented technologies for the professional training of masters in the humanitarian field.","PeriodicalId":130848,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian professional education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian professional education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33989/2519-8254.2022.11.275543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, based on the analysis of modern aspects of the modernization of the world and national educational systems, the question of the formation of professional values and attitudes of specialists in the humanitarian field (philosophers, historians, religious scholars, philologists, culturologists) as carriers of general culture and creators of humanistic practices of the interaction of various social and ethnic groups on axiological grounds is updated. The paper aims to systematically analyze samples of psychological-pedagogical and philosophical-educational discourse, which reflect modern axiological ideas, the history of the development of educational values, and proposed means of implementing these assets in the national system of training specialists in the humanitarian field. Leading psychological-pedagogical models of discourse include freedom of thought as a variant of the individual’s freedom to choose a system of values (P. Shchedrovytskyi), the three-component approach to personality (G. Lasuel, Z. Freud); identification of value paradigms of education (O. Sukhomlynska, N. Tkachova); the concept of education as a socio-cultural phenomenon (V. Ohneviuk); the need for corrections in the management of education as a social institution (V. Kryzhko) and others. The assets of the philosophical and educational discourse of the research issue were chosen: S. Klepko’s identification of the leading regulatory values of education – love, and agreement with the values of being; interpretation of I. Utyuzh’s self-worth of education in line with the philosophical and anthropological tradition, the vision of the personality of a specialist as the dominant value of Ukrainian professional education; the scientific position of scientists regarding the fact that no value system can be implemented without the creative innovations of an individual since the development of professional culture is impossible without the cultivation of the individual's creative potential (A. Arkhiezer, M. Sheler, I. Ziaziun). It was found that the main perspective of the research is the search for ways to resolve the contradictions between the social demand for a creative, active, harmonious value system of a professional personality and the lack of value-oriented technologies for the professional training of masters in the humanitarian field.
基于价值论的人文硕士培养问题的心理教育学与哲学教育学论述
本文在分析世界和国家教育体系现代化的现代方面的基础上,更新了人文领域专家(哲学家、历史学家、宗教学者、文献学家、文化学家)作为一般文化的载体和在价值论基础上创造各种社会和民族群体相互作用的人文实践的问题。本文旨在系统地分析反映现代价值论思想和教育价值发展历史的心理学-教育学和哲学-教育话语样本,并提出在国家人道主义领域专家培训体系中实施这些资产的方法。主要的心理学教学话语模型包括思想自由,作为个人选择价值体系的自由的一种变体(P. Shchedrovytskyi),人格的三要素方法(G. Lasuel, Z. Freud);教育价值范式的识别(O. Sukhomlynska, N. Tkachova);教育作为一种社会文化现象的概念(V. Ohneviuk);教育作为一种社会机构的管理需要纠正(V. Kryzhko)等。本研究议题的哲学和教育话语的资产被选择:S. Klepko对教育的主要调节价值-爱的认同,并与存在的价值一致;根据哲学和人类学传统解读乌图日的教育自我价值,将专家的个性视为乌克兰专业教育的主导价值;科学家的科学立场,即没有个人的创造性创新,任何价值体系都无法实现,因为没有个人创造潜力的培养,职业文化的发展是不可能的(A. Arkhiezer, M. Sheler, I. Ziaziun)。研究发现,研究的主要视角是寻求解决社会对创造性、主动性、和谐的职业人格价值体系的需求与人文领域硕士专业培养缺乏价值导向技术之间的矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信