{"title":"La difícil empleabilidad alarga la pensión compensatoria","authors":"Antonio V. Sempere Navarro","doi":"10.55104/rjl_00363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tras las situaciones de crisis matrimonial es frecuente que uno de los cónyuges venga obligado a compensar al otro por el desequilibrio económico que comporta la ruptura matrimonial. A su vez, el abono de esa pensión está temporalmente condicionado por las posibilidades de que quien la percibe obtenga ingresos propios. El Tribunal Supremo (Sala Primera) ha tomado en cuenta las dificultades que posee el acceso al mercado laboral cuando se ha cumplido la edad que permite percibir el \"subsidio de prejubilación\". En concreto, para sentar la doctrina de que en tales casos no procede fijar un límite temporal a la pensión compensatoria. Se trata de un ejemplo más de la interacción que los diversos sectores del ordenamiento jurídico mantienen, consecuencia de su unidad.\n\n\nAfter marital crisis situations, it is common for one of the spouses to be forced to compensate the other for the economic imbalance that the marriage breakup entails. In turn, the payment of this pension is temporarily conditioned by the possibilities of the person receiving it obtaining their own income. The Supreme Court (First Chamber) has taken into account the difficulties of access to the labor market when the age that allows receiving the \"pre-retirement subsidy\" has been reached. Specifically, to establish the doctrine that in such cases it is not appropriate to set a temporary limit to the compensatory pension. This is one more example of the interaction that the various sectors of the legal system maintain, a consequence of its unity.","PeriodicalId":291945,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Jurisprudencia Laboral","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Jurisprudencia Laboral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55104/rjl_00363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tras las situaciones de crisis matrimonial es frecuente que uno de los cónyuges venga obligado a compensar al otro por el desequilibrio económico que comporta la ruptura matrimonial. A su vez, el abono de esa pensión está temporalmente condicionado por las posibilidades de que quien la percibe obtenga ingresos propios. El Tribunal Supremo (Sala Primera) ha tomado en cuenta las dificultades que posee el acceso al mercado laboral cuando se ha cumplido la edad que permite percibir el "subsidio de prejubilación". En concreto, para sentar la doctrina de que en tales casos no procede fijar un límite temporal a la pensión compensatoria. Se trata de un ejemplo más de la interacción que los diversos sectores del ordenamiento jurídico mantienen, consecuencia de su unidad.
After marital crisis situations, it is common for one of the spouses to be forced to compensate the other for the economic imbalance that the marriage breakup entails. In turn, the payment of this pension is temporarily conditioned by the possibilities of the person receiving it obtaining their own income. The Supreme Court (First Chamber) has taken into account the difficulties of access to the labor market when the age that allows receiving the "pre-retirement subsidy" has been reached. Specifically, to establish the doctrine that in such cases it is not appropriate to set a temporary limit to the compensatory pension. This is one more example of the interaction that the various sectors of the legal system maintain, a consequence of its unity.