Recognizing Tourmaline in Mineralized Porphyry Cu Systems: Textures and Major-Element Chemistry

IF 1.3
C. Beckett-Brown, A. McDonald, M. McClenaghan
{"title":"Recognizing Tourmaline in Mineralized Porphyry Cu Systems: Textures and Major-Element Chemistry","authors":"C. Beckett-Brown, A. McDonald, M. McClenaghan","doi":"10.3749/2200011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Samples of tourmaline supergroup minerals from seven mineralized porphyry systems (Cu, ±Au, ±Mo), including Casino (Yukon Territory, Canada), Coxheath (Nova Scotia, Canada), Donoso breccia-Los Bronces (Chile), Highland Valley Copper (British Columbia, Canada), New Afton (British Columbia, Canada), Schaft Creek (British Columbia, Canada), and Woodjam (British Columbia, Canada), were examined at a variety of scales to evaluate their relationships with mineralization. Data from paragenetic observations show that tourmaline supergroup minerals are generally early hydrothermal minerals that predate both mineralization and alteration (e.g., overgrown and crosscut by). In general, tourmaline supergroup minerals occur as sub- to euhedral crystals that are black in hand sample and can be found in a variety of mineralized settings (including breccias, veins, and disseminations) and alteration assemblages (including potassic, sodic-calcic, phyllic, propylitic, and argillic). As tourmaline supergroup minerals are physically and chemically resilient and occur throughout a given porphyry system, they are comprehensive recorders of the type and extent of various geochemical processes that exist during the complex genesis of these systems. Data from BSE imaging shows two primary zonation types: concentric and sector. These are interpreted to reflect conditions of rapid crystallization and disequilibrium. Results from SEM-EDS analyses show that most tourmaline supergroup minerals are dravite (∼80% of grains), with the remainder being primarily classified as schorl. Porphyry tourmaline supergroup minerals exhibit remarkably consistent ∼2.0 apfu Mg values (range: 0.69–2.89), with the majority of tourmaline supergroup minerals plotting along the oxy-dravite–povondraite trend, reflecting the predominance of the Al3+ ↔ Fe3+ substitution at constant Mg values. This pattern starts from the povondraite side (reflecting the oxidizing nature of early porphyry mineralizing fluids) and trends toward oxy-dravite as a porphyry system evolves, a feature that can, in turn, be interpreted to reflect relative emplacement depths. In mineralized porphyry systems, tourmaline supergroup minerals exhibit remarkably similar physical and chemical characteristics among the systems examined, suggesting that the source and geological processes must be extraordinarily similar. Unfortunately, these characteristics are not unique to porphyry systems and such observations should be integrated with additional data, such as trace element mineral chemistry, to effectively discriminate tourmaline supergroup minerals that have formed in porphyry systems.","PeriodicalId":218967,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3749/2200011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Samples of tourmaline supergroup minerals from seven mineralized porphyry systems (Cu, ±Au, ±Mo), including Casino (Yukon Territory, Canada), Coxheath (Nova Scotia, Canada), Donoso breccia-Los Bronces (Chile), Highland Valley Copper (British Columbia, Canada), New Afton (British Columbia, Canada), Schaft Creek (British Columbia, Canada), and Woodjam (British Columbia, Canada), were examined at a variety of scales to evaluate their relationships with mineralization. Data from paragenetic observations show that tourmaline supergroup minerals are generally early hydrothermal minerals that predate both mineralization and alteration (e.g., overgrown and crosscut by). In general, tourmaline supergroup minerals occur as sub- to euhedral crystals that are black in hand sample and can be found in a variety of mineralized settings (including breccias, veins, and disseminations) and alteration assemblages (including potassic, sodic-calcic, phyllic, propylitic, and argillic). As tourmaline supergroup minerals are physically and chemically resilient and occur throughout a given porphyry system, they are comprehensive recorders of the type and extent of various geochemical processes that exist during the complex genesis of these systems. Data from BSE imaging shows two primary zonation types: concentric and sector. These are interpreted to reflect conditions of rapid crystallization and disequilibrium. Results from SEM-EDS analyses show that most tourmaline supergroup minerals are dravite (∼80% of grains), with the remainder being primarily classified as schorl. Porphyry tourmaline supergroup minerals exhibit remarkably consistent ∼2.0 apfu Mg values (range: 0.69–2.89), with the majority of tourmaline supergroup minerals plotting along the oxy-dravite–povondraite trend, reflecting the predominance of the Al3+ ↔ Fe3+ substitution at constant Mg values. This pattern starts from the povondraite side (reflecting the oxidizing nature of early porphyry mineralizing fluids) and trends toward oxy-dravite as a porphyry system evolves, a feature that can, in turn, be interpreted to reflect relative emplacement depths. In mineralized porphyry systems, tourmaline supergroup minerals exhibit remarkably similar physical and chemical characteristics among the systems examined, suggesting that the source and geological processes must be extraordinarily similar. Unfortunately, these characteristics are not unique to porphyry systems and such observations should be integrated with additional data, such as trace element mineral chemistry, to effectively discriminate tourmaline supergroup minerals that have formed in porphyry systems.
矿化斑岩Cu系统中电气石的识别:结构和主元素化学
从加拿大育空地区的Casino、加拿大新斯科舍省的Coxheath、智利的Donoso角砾岩- los Bronces、加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的Highland Valley Copper、加拿大的New Afton、加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的Schaft Creek和加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的Woodjam等7个斑岩矿化系统(Cu、±Au、±Mo)中,对电石超群矿物进行了不同尺度的检测,以评价其与成矿的关系。共生观测资料表明,电气石超群矿物一般为早于矿化和蚀变的早期热液矿物(如丛生和横切)。一般来说,电气石超群矿物以亚自体晶体的形式出现,在样品中呈黑色,可以在各种矿化环境(包括角砾岩、脉状和传播)和蚀变组合(包括钾质、钠钙质、叶基、丙基和泥质)中找到。由于电气石超群矿物具有物理和化学上的弹性,并且在给定的斑岩系统中普遍存在,因此它们是这些系统复杂成因过程中各种地球化学过程类型和程度的综合记录者。来自疯牛病成像的数据显示了两种主要的分区类型:同心和扇形。这些被解释为反映了快速结晶和不平衡的条件。SEM-EDS分析结果表明,电气石超群矿物大部分为驱动石(约占颗粒的80%),其余主要为榴石。斑岩型电气石超群矿物表现出非常一致的~ 2.0 apfu Mg值(范围:0.69-2.89),大多数电气石超群矿物沿氧导石-钾云母矿趋势绘制,反映了恒定Mg值下Al3+↔Fe3+的优势。这种模式从斑岩一侧开始(反映了早期斑岩矿化流体的氧化性质),随着斑岩系统的演化,向氧导云岩方向发展,这一特征反过来又可以解释为反映相对侵位深度。在矿化斑岩系统中,电气石超群矿物在所研究的系统中表现出非常相似的物理和化学特征,表明其来源和地质过程必须非常相似。不幸的是,这些特征并不是斑岩系统所独有的,这些观察结果应与其他数据(如微量元素矿物化学)相结合,以有效区分斑岩系统中形成的电气石超群矿物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书